排序方式: 共有8条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Volume Contents
Contents of Volume 14 相似文献3.
Mario Jori 《International Journal for the Semiotics of Law》2001,14(1):41-69
The author considers the distinction drawn by Ferrajoli betweenrights and their guarantees to be an important acquisition forpost-Kelsenian legal theory, but criticises the distinction drawn between fundamental rights and patrimonial rights, in particular contesting the hypothesis that non-disposability/inalienabilityis a characteristic of fundamental rights. On the contrary, Joribelieves that there is a substantial symmetry between fundamentalrights and patrimonial rights, because patrimonial rights can beseen as guarantees of the fundamental right of equal legal capacity.He also argues that the distinction between fundamental and patrimonial rights cannot be drawn solely on the formal terrain, but must beextended to their contents and their ethical importance. Finally,he studies Ferrajoli's thesis of citizenship: in his opinion, theabolition of citizenship hoped for by Ferrajoli would lead to asort of imperialism of rights, ethically a position fraught withproblems, in the light of the ethical value of individual autonomy. 相似文献
4.
5.
Mario Jori 《International Journal for the Semiotics of Law》1989,2(3):277-300
Sans résumé 相似文献
6.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique - 相似文献
7.
8.
Authors Index
Author Index of Volume 14 相似文献
1