首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   128篇
  免费   2篇
  国内免费   1篇
各国政治   18篇
工人农民   2篇
世界政治   4篇
外交国际关系   2篇
法律   97篇
中国共产党   1篇
中国政治   2篇
政治理论   5篇
  2018年   2篇
  2017年   1篇
  2014年   1篇
  2013年   67篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   1篇
  2008年   2篇
  2007年   2篇
  2004年   1篇
  2001年   2篇
  2000年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1991年   1篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   3篇
  1986年   3篇
  1985年   5篇
  1984年   8篇
  1983年   8篇
  1982年   2篇
  1981年   3篇
  1980年   3篇
  1978年   1篇
  1977年   6篇
  1975年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1943年   1篇
排序方式: 共有131条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Over the past ten years or so, there has been a renewed interest in the moral education theory of punishment. The attractions of the theory are numerous, not least of which is that it offers hopes for a breakthrough in the apparently intractable debate between deterrence theorists and retributivists. Nevertheless, I believe there are severe problems with recent formulations of the theory. First, contemporary educationists all place great emphasis on autonomy, yet fail to show how continued respect for autonomy is compatible with achievement of their stated punitive goals. Second, educationists have, and possibly must, take incarceration as the best available punitive sanction. Yet it is unclear how morally educative such a punishment will be. Third, contemporary educationists view punishment as a benefit to be conferred on an offender. But educationists have not succeeded in arguing that society is obligated to confer such benefits, nor have they adequately defended the Platonic moral psychology necessary to show that moral education is always a benefit to justly punished offenders. Fourth, contemporary educationists are hopeful that an indeterminate sentencing policy can be avoided, but I argue that such a policy is an ineliminable component of an educationist justification of punishment. Finally, I raise some doubts about the scope that educationist goals ought to have in any comprehensive theory of punishment.  相似文献   
6.
7.
8.
9.
What’s a developing nation? For that matter, what’s technology transfer? When put in the context of exporting and importing technology, the answers are moot. Transfer still turns on how much someone — developed, developing or undeveloped — is willing to pay for the technology, and whether there is an identifiable need that it can satisfy with a minimum of sophistication. The simpler — and cheaper — the better. That may very well become the theme of a new worldwide movement called “appropriate technology”, which, among several other matters, is also discussed in this paper.  相似文献   
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号