17世纪初至18世纪中后期越南南河海外贸易中的华商

17世纪初至18世纪中后期，越南南河阮氏政权的海外贸易迅速发展，成为东亚海上贸易的一大亮点。作为当时东亚海上贸易的主导者，华商以操作者、推动者和管理者的身份参与南河海外贸易发展的全过程，为其发展和兴盛做出了重要贡献，同时也为自身的生存和发展打下了坚实的基础。     

《大越史记全书》的评论与改编:从《越史标案》到《大越史记前编》

1697年《大越史记全书》的完稿与刻印,标志着中兴黎朝官方史学体系的确立,官员学者继而对其改编、评论,产生了一系列史学著作,其中黎贵惇作《国史续编》,阮俨作《越史备览》,阮辉删成《国史纂要》,供教学之用。吴时仕的《越史标案》发覆最多,对越南的国家起源、自主王朝的历史以及与中国的关系重做评论,体现了"我越"的文化主体性,对《大越史记全书》原有的史论观点产生了很大的冲击。之后吴时仕之子吴时任为西山阮朝国史总裁,以《大越史记全书》为叙史主干,以家藏《越史标案》为史论主体,又综合采纳黎文休、吴士连、阮俨的史论,于1800年编成并刻印《大越史记前编》,吴时仕和阮俨的私家史学遂得居官修史书之列。《大越史记前编》是继《大越史记全书》之后,以官方力量整合既有的越史著作,重塑越南历史文化的重要举措,在越南史学发展中具有重大意义和价值。1802年阮朝建立之后,鉴于黎末郑氏主政以及西山阮朝篡逆的情况,对这两个时代的史书进行清理。在前代史书基础上修成的《大越史记前编》被弃,但其部分思想观点被阮朝国史馆新修的《钦定越史通鉴纲目》所继承。关于《大越史记全书》的评论和改编,体现了越南古代史学发展的路径与思想,是越南古代历史文化的重要组成部分。     

Becoming and being urban in Hanoi: Rural-urban migration and relations in Viet Nam

The discourse of the rural-urban migrant is that of a sojourner in the city, a man or a woman who will almost inevitably return to his or her rural roots and re-engage with farming and village living. In this paper we ask whether rural-urban migrants can ‘become’ urban and shed their identification as temporary denizens of the city. We develop a conceptual framework that provides five entry points to explore this process of becoming urban, and then apply the framework drawing on the experiences of migrants to Viet Nam's capital, Hanoi. We argue that even when migrants do return to their homelands they do so with altered priorities and on different terms. The experience of migration was not infrequently transformative and life-changing. While migrants may not ‘become’ urban in the fullest sense, their homeland had become a space of familial origin and emotional identification, not a place where people necessarily sought to reside, work, raise their children and build their lives.     

闽商在越南南河的贸易及闽文化的传播

在1600—1774年南河阮氏政权存续期间,闽商与南河的贸易得到了持续不断的发展。该发展过程大致可分为1600—1639贸易爆发期、1640—1683郑氏垄断贸易期和1684—1774全面发展3个阶段。贸易的发展促进了闽商与南河社会的交流,带动了众多的闽人移居南河。相应地,福建的物质文化、精神文化和制度文化得以在广南传播、发展与融合,为南河经济文化的发展和闽越经济文化交流作出了重要贡献。     

From kanun-ı kadim (ancient law) to umumun kuvveti (force of people): historical context of the Ottoman constitutionalism

This paper attempts to examine the prevailing scholarly view on the Young Ottoman and the Young Turk movements, which postulates that the concept of constitutionalism was solely and directly based on the western model, imported by the constitutionalist movements to the Ottoman Empire. As a child of the ‘modernization theory’, this approach mostly concentrates on European impact in an isolated manner, thus overlooking not only the manifold sources of the Ottoman constitutionalism, but also the means of legitimation that the Young Ottomans and the Young Turks cultivated. In view of this, I seek to shed light on the historical context of the Ottoman constitutionalism, by pointing out how the Young Ottomans and the Young Turks perceived the power struggles in the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and built continuity between themselves and the political position that aimed to restrict the royal prerogative before the nineteenth century.     

英属马来亚华人二战前社会运动史类型——以霹雳州为例

本文主要探讨二战前英属马来亚华人的社会运动的类型。一般认为,二战前英属马来亚华人的群众运动受到民族和爱国主义的影响。本文尝试从另一角度进行探讨,即:运动的本土性,符合居住地的现实考虑及需求等。本文通过分析典藏在星、马和台湾的档案,把二战前马来亚华人的社会运动分为两个种类:一、倾向支持中国的社会运动,二、响应本土性课题而开展的社会运动,由此去探索二战前马来亚华人的本土关怀。