引文失范研究

引文失范是引用者违背学术共同体（行业协会、组织或学术研究管理机关）根据学术发展规律参与制定的有利于学术积累和创新的关于文献引用（引证）的各种准则和相关要求。引文失范的类型主要有：引而不精、引而不全、引而不通、引而不著、多引少著、引著不矩。引文失范的原因在于引文规范的缺失、科研伦理的缺位、引文教育的失真、引用者自身的缺陷以及出版单位的＂功利＂追逐。力戒引文失范,应建立引文伦理规范制度、加强引文伦理规范制度的宣传与学习、强化引文知识的宣传普及、增加对引文（含注释及参考文献）的校验。     

Legal Transplantation in the Judicature: Employing Foreign Laws in China’s Judicial Practice

For wholly domestic cases, when there are no suitable domestic provisions and similar precedents, the courts in some countries will directly incite relevant foreign legislations or precedents. While in China, never before had its judicature ever used foreign laws or comparative law to handle non-foreign cases. However, in recent years, with the gradual opening of China’s judicial area, its judicature also begin to use precedents of foreign and comparative laws.     

Comparing federal institutions: Power and representation in six federations

The study of comparative federalism is often hampered by the diverse range of federal institutional arrangements in practice, as well as the ambiguity surrounding the concept of federalism. This article identifies three main conceptual approaches to federalism – sociological, constitutional, and governmental – then proposes a revised governmental approach that takes account of the institutional effects of federalism, for application in comparative politics research. Minimally defined, all federations are products of institutional rules that create separate territorial spheres of authority. This article compares Canada, the United States, Australia, Austria, Germany and Switzerland along two key institutional dimensions that structure politics in the federal state: resource allocation, and the representation of constituent units in federal-level decision-making.     

中国行政法学三十年高影响论文之回顾与反思——基于主流数据库(1978—2008年)的引证分析

结合两大引用数据库CSSCI和CNKI,两大文摘数据库《新华文摘》和《复印报刊资料》,采用被引用和被转载两项指标,挖掘反映行政法学术影响力的高引率论文,力图通过客观的数据分析,纵览改革开放30年中国行政法学的研究焦点,从而试图为今后行政法学术发展形成共同的文献基础。     

引文规范路径探索--兼评《高等学校哲学社会科学研究学术规范》之“学术引文规范”

引文规范是引用者遵循学术共同体（行业协会、组织或学术研究管理机关）根据学术发展规律参与制定的有利于学术积累和创新的关于文献引用（引证）的各种准则和相关要求。引文规范路径：明确引文规范内涵,是解决引文规范的的首要前提;加强对引文规范主体的教育和培训,是实现引文规范的根本措施;完善引文规范督查机制,是实现引文规范的最后保障。《高等学校哲学社会科学研究学术规范》之“学术引文规范”略有瑕疵。建议增加“注释的规范化编排”、“引文量的限定”以及“引文的基本要求”等内容。