离婚救济制度之实证研究

在北京、厦门、哈尔滨三地部分法院的调查显示 ,离婚救济制度目前在司法实践中未能得到有效适用。特别是离婚经济补偿制度和离婚损害赔偿制度适用者寥寥无几。而离婚经济帮助制度也存在着适用条件苛刻 ,受助者范围小 ,住房帮助的规定难以落到实处 ,金钱帮助数额偏低 ,经济帮助实际不到位的问题。针对调查中所显示的制度缺位与不周延问题 ,需要从制度层面进行反思 ,考虑制度性重构。     

离婚诉讼之反诉初探

反诉制度在我国诉讼理论及实践中尚不完善,而对于其一分支离婚诉讼的反诉则更属空白地带,本文从诉权、诉 讼标的、反诉的理论构成及司法实务方面阐述了设立离婚诉讼的必要,并在此基础上提出了一些完善设想。     

论离婚损害赔偿制度的法律适用

离婚损害赔偿是配偶一方违法侵害他方的合法权益 ,导致婚姻关系破裂 ,离婚时对无过错配偶方所受的损害 ,过错配偶应承担民事责任的法律制度。离婚损害赔偿民事责任须具备一定的构成要件。离婚损害赔偿的权利主体应是无过错的配偶方 ,义务主体应是实施了法定违法行为的过错配偶方 ,不宜将离婚当事人以外的第三人也视为义务主体。离婚损害赔偿既包括物质损害赔偿 ,也包括精神损害赔偿 ,而精神损害赔偿意在对无过错受害方给予精神抚慰。     

Risks and Realities of Working with Alienated Children

Involvement in custody cases that include accusations of parental alienation—whether as an evaluator, expert witness, lawyer, judge, therapist, provider of a specialized intervention, or researcher—incurs both professional and personal risks. Some risks relate to false negative or false positive identifications of parental alienation that can lead to regulatory agency complaints and public condemnation by the parent who feels wronged by the case outcome. Other risks stem from providing services in an emerging area of practice and working with children who overtly oppose repairing the relationship with their rejected parent. These risks include: unfounded accusations of mistreating children; negatively biased commentary and sensationalist attacks in the media and in social media, professional conferences and journals, and in courtroom testimony; harassment, vilification, and invasion of privacy; threats of violence and public humiliation; shunning and rumor spreading by colleagues; and complaints to regulatory agencies. This article examines circumstances, beliefs, and dynamics that give rise to these risks, suggests precautions to reduce the risk of false accusations against professionals, and offers recommendations for dealing with regulatory agencies. Criticisms that a court or service provider has mistreated a child merit careful scrutiny in the context of the case evidence and empirical data. While some interventions for alienated children raise legitimate concerns, others have been maligned by anecdotal complaints that studies show do not represent the experience of most participants.     

Responding to Severe Parent–Child Rejection Cases Without a Parentectomy: A Blended Sequential Intervention Model and the Role of the Courts

There have been significant developments over the past two decades that have expanded our understanding of the dynamics of parent–child contact problems post‐separation, which have resulted in some changes in judicial processes to respond to these cases. One significant advancement is a more sophisticated differentiation of the nature and severity of contact problems, which better assists legal and mental health professionals to provide more suitable legal and clinical interventions. However, the issue of innovative court processes has received limited attention. The authors describe a subgroup of families within the “severe” category, for whom an expanded intervention model, referred to as a Blended Sequential Intervention is proposed. This approach involves a reversal of care with court mandated therapeutic support for the rejected parent and child, but also involves the favored parent in the therapeutic plan from the outset, and is intended to avoid a permanent “parentectomy” of the child from either parent. The authors discuss how the courts should respond to these cases, and posit that until all therapeutic treatments are exhausted, interim orders should be preferred to final determinations, and judges should maintain oversight. The authors discuss the critical role of judicial leadership in working with lawyers and mental health professionals to manage and address the issues in these high conflict cases.     

Parenting Coordination In Cases Involving Intimate Partner Violence

Parenting Coordination is a “hybrid legal‐mental health role that combines assessment, education, case management, conflict management, dispute resolution and, often times, decision‐making functions (AFCC, 2019, https://www.afccnet.org/Portals/0/PublicDocuments/Guidelines%20for%20PC%20with%20Appendex.pdf?ver=2020-01-30-190220-990 ). This article addresses issues that arise when the case has allegations or findings of intimate partner violence (IPV). Considerations of the type of IPV, the severity, timing, perpetrator and effects on coparenting are discussed in the context of the parenting coordinator's role. Through screening and assessment, we differentiate the kinds of cases with the presence of IPV where a PC may be effective as opposed to other IPV cases that may not predict success for retaining a PC.     

美国对台湾“政治安排”的政策及影响

美国对台湾“政治安排”的政策对“合情合理安排两岸政治关系”有重要影响。美国对台湾政治定位的政策是“认知到台湾是中国的一部分”,不支持“台独”或“两个中国”,但同时又“对台湾地位不持立场”。在两岸关系的解决方式方面,美国对台湾的前途持开放立场,但认为应透过对话和平解决,且要尊重两岸民众的意愿。美国这一政策增加了对统一前两岸政治关系做出“合情合理安排”的难度,但在某些方面与大陆对台政策也有一致性。目前,两岸应充分利用这些相契合的政策,推进两岸政治关系做出“合情合理”安排。     

中国农村的自杀问题(1980-2009)——兼与景军先生等商榷

通过对7省34村的质性访谈而获得的1980-2009年间604例农民自杀死亡案例的数据分析,本文认为当前农村自杀率仍呈显著上升态势。青年人自杀率的显著下降与老年人自杀率的急速上升并行不悖地运行于当下农村,青年女性自杀率的显著下降拉低了青年人整体自杀率并使之向下运行,然而,老年人自杀率的急速上升则拉升了农村的整体自杀率并使之向上运行。分析指出,决定这种复杂形貌的因素并非农村女性的迁移所导致,而是由于代际关系变动与离婚加速兴起所造成。其背后更为深刻的机制则表明,当前农村自杀率的复杂变化是现代性持续地侵蚀农村的产物。     

中国特大城市政府效率研究——以北京、上海、广州为例的个案分析

本文从中国特大城市政府管理的特点出发分析了特大城市政府效率的性质,认为特大城市政府效率具有公共性和层次性的特点。特大城市政府效率从纵向上说是组织效率、管理效率和机械效率的统一,从横向上说是制度效率、配置效率和技术效率的统一。文章从制度效率、配置效率和技术效率这三个层面,以北京、上海和广州这些中国最具有代表性的特大城市为例分析了特大城市政府在提高政府效率方面所取得的成就,并分析了仍然存在的一些问题,在此基础上提出了进一步提高特大城市政府效率的对策和建议。     

刑事一体化视野下“严打”的理性思考

"严打"是现阶段我国重要的刑事政策,也是近年来法学界关注的热点。对其肯定与否定的观点都不难找到一些理论依据。事实上,"严打"一方面最大限度地发挥了刑罚的一般预防功能,满足了公众报应心理,但又在一定程度上体现了刑罚万能的重刑主义思想:"严打"虽然是我国现阶段控制犯罪的必要选择,但又具有明显的行政强制和人治色彩。在刑事一体化的视野下,应理性评估"严打"的得失,将"严打"与国家其他刑事政策、刑事实体法与刑事程序法等加以协调,其中,"重重轻轻"或日"惩办与宽大相结合"应是我国现阶段刑事政策的基点。