携带电话消费者的权利维护——从法律视角关注不良短信问题

近年我国出现了诸多不良短信问题,如短信污染、短信欺诈、手机病毒等,严重侵害了手机消费者的合法权益,短信服务市场的状况令人堪忧。而造成短信服务市场失范的一个重要原因是电信运营商没有忠实履行自己善良管理人的注意义务,没有为消费者提供安全的电信服务。要解决出现的不良短信问题和规制运营商的服务,应从电信业务经营者的行业自律、加强电信立法、实施有效监管、建立合理的诉讼程序等方面着手,以期使短信服务市场规范有序,真正维护手机消费者的权利。     

关于一类半无限多目标规划离散型算法的偏差估计

本文将文献[5]中的偏差估计公式推广到有任意多个目标函数和α∈(0, ∞)的情形并给出约束参数集维数可任意的数值例子.     

论我国经营者集中控制标准的立法不足

虽然我国《反垄断法》制定工作长达十三年,但是有关经营者集中控制标准的规定还是存在一些立法问题。基本控制标准的规定缺乏法律规范的必要指引性,给经营者的守法带来了困惑。修正控制标准的规定背离了反垄断法的立法目标,这可能影响到执法的科学性。经营者集中控制标准的适用范围具有局限性,它并不能够满足自然垄断行业的特殊需求。这些立法不足需要及时加以弥补与完善。     

试论经营者的强制性信息披露义务

消费者知情权对应的主要是经营者的强制性信息披露义务,我国现行《消法》克服市场交易信息不对称的主要方式在于确立经营者的自愿说明义务。解决问题的关键在于法律上直接赋予经营者的强制性信息披露义务,对《消法》的模糊性规定予以修正,明文规定经营者四种情形下的强制性信息披露义务。     

Full-Pricing Autonomy

正Fair competition among all types of operators will be the future of China’s telecom industry By Lan Xinzhen On May 17,World Telecommunications Day,China’s telecom operators launched promotions as usual,but this year,they directly cut their prices.China Unicom offered discounts as high as 90 percent off for data     

3g运营商的法律风险分析——以3g产业链为视角

随着3g通信技术的深度发展,3g产业链呈现出多维互动格局.运营商将在更多环节、更广泛区域内与更多主体形成复杂和敏感的法律关系,从而增大了运营商所承担的法律风险.运营商必须强化对3g产业链的控制、协调、整合,合理有效地防范3g运营的法律风险.     

New resources for the forensic genetics community available on the NIST STRBase website

For more than a decade, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has maintained the short tandem repeat DNA Internet database (STRBase), which is located at http://www.cstl.nist.gov/biotech/strbase/. The purpose of STRBase has been and continues to be an attempt to bring together the abundant literature and information in the forensic genetics field in a cohesive fashion to make current and future work easier. New materials are regularly added to expand the valuable information contained on the STRBase website.     

经营者场所安全责任的合理边界

经营者场所安全责任,是指经营者在提供商品或服务时,因为经营场所的安全未能达到保障消费者人身、财产安全的法定要求或者合同约定的标准,导致消费者人身、财产遭受损害,从而应当承担的民事责任。其责任范围包括时间、空间、对象三方面,安全责任随着服务延伸而扩展。受害人与经营者就场所安全责任发生的争议主要是:侵权责任还是合同违约责任,过错责任还是无过错责任,比例赔偿还是全面赔偿,原告举证还是被告举证。经营者承担的场所安全责任应当以防范设施有效、警示明确、管理谨慎周到、制止侵害果敢、实施救助及时、保全证据妥善作为合理边界。     

The liability of website owners for defamation in Israel: A challenge yet to be solved?

From the end of the twentieth century to the present we have witnessed the effects of technology on the way we consume and distribute information. The print media, which in many ways was the natural product of the printing revolution, has given way to the electronic media with websites providing the new “town squares” in which the public discourse is held on political, economic and social issues among others. The Israeli legal system, like the legal systems in other countries, faces a variety of challenges and complex ethical and legal issues when required to regulate (often retrospectively) the manner and processes through which the discourse will be conducted in the virtual “town hall”. In essence, this article focuses on one of the many questions occupying the Israeli legal system and that is whether website owners should be liable in defamation for speech published by third parties on the Internet (through blogs, tweets on Twitter, posts on Facebook,¹ uploaded video clips on YouTube and the like) when no connection exists between the third party and the site owner apart from the fact that the third party has used the website as a platform to publish the offensive speech. The issue of the liability of the website owner has ramifications for the injured party's capacity to institute an action for defamation against the website owner, as often only the latter will be in a position to compensate the injured party (financially) for the offensive speech. The Israeli legal system, which in many ways furnishes a unique and interesting framework for examining the question posed above, as we explain in the body of the article, presents a fascinating example of how the Israeli legislature and the courts have dealt and continue to deal with claims filed against website owners for damage to reputation as a result of speech published by third parties. The article offers a comprehensive review of the status of the right to freedom of speech, anonymity and the right to reputation in Israel, the considerations for and against the imposition of liability on website owners and the latest case law on these questions.     

港口经营人责任限制问题再探讨

探讨民法责任限制制度的一般原理,并对学界所主张的给予港口经营人责任限制的各种理由予以分析,指出这些理由难以成立,港口经营人不应享有责任限制权利,应对此在立法中作出明确的否定性规定。