Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts?

ABSTRACT

Recently, “problem-solving” courts have been developed as an alternative to imprisonment. They are often called “specialty” courts because they process and divert into treatment programs offenders who are seen as different from the general criminal population, such as those with mental health or drug problems, those who are homeless or veterans, and those who engage in domestic violence. Based on a 2017 national survey of 1,000 respondents, the current study examines overall public support for rehabilitation as a goal of corrections and then focuses specifically on support for different types of specialty courts. The analysis reveals that the American public endorses not only the rehabilitative ideal but also the use of problem-solving courts. Further, with only minimal variation, strong support for these courts appears to exist regardless of political orientation and sociodemographic characteristics.     

毒品洗钱犯罪问题研究

毒品犯罪与洗钱犯罪是密不可分的,进入20世纪80年代以后,毒品洗钱犯罪活动日益严重。毒品犯罪集团绞尽脑汁,利用各种可能的方式与手段进行洗钱活动,给全世界、全人类带来了巨大的灾难。分析研究毒品洗钱犯罪的未来发展趋势,使我们可以深刻的认识其危害性,以便今后能够更好的预防和打击这类犯罪活动。     

Data Protection: An Opening Door?

Swedish public law has incorporated a general rule of public access to documents, and to information in the wider sense, since the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766. On the Community level, the relationship between Regulation (EC) 45/2001 on data protection and Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 on public access to documents exemplifies the tension between the public's interest in scrutinising the administration carried on in its name, and the integrity of the individual. However, a similar tension exists between Sweden's Personal Data Act of 1998, implementing Directive 95/46, and the Freedom of the Press Act. A misuse model of data protection law, by seeking to concentrate on serious rather than technical infringements of privacy, might serve to ease the tension. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and are not attributable to any Community institution. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

INTRODUCING PERSPECTIVES IN FAMILY LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH

This article provides an editorial introduction to the following three related articles on the growing use and influence of social science research in family law. It first considers why this has become problematic and identifies some common strategies used by advocates, sometimes under the guise of scholarship, to destroy the standing of research findings contrary to their ideological or political position. Then it discusses briefly the remedies proposed to mitigate these kinds of problems within the following three articles.     

兽药缓控速释药剂型的研究进展

简要介绍了兽药缓控速释剂型的产生、发展、动力学过程及其分类,并着重阐述了兽药缓控速释药的应用现状、发展动力、研究热点与趋势,分析了兽药缓控速释剂型研究中存在的问题,旨在为广大兽医药工作者研制兽药新剂型提供参考。     

血浆中芬太尼的检测

本文概括阐述了近10年国内外检测血浆中芬太尼的基本情况。对各种检测方法及分离净化过程中应用的各种萃取方法进行了对比和分析。在此基础上提出我国药物动力学研究及公安司法工作对检测血浆中芬太尼的新要求。     

8例利多卡因过敏性休克死的血药浓度分析

目的研究利多卡因过敏性休克死者利多卡因血药浓度及其与死因的关系。方法采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC),分别对使用利多卡因麻醉术中各项指标均正常的8例术中因利多卡因过敏性休克死者的血液和11例顺利完成手术患者的血液进行利多卡因浓度的检测,对比分析两者结果。结果 8例死者利多卡因血药浓度(1．61mg± 0．45mg／L)低于11例正常患者利多卡因血药浓度(2．44mg±0．47mg／L)。结论利多卡因过敏性休克死者血药浓度在正常值范围内,与发生过敏性休克致死无关。     

“毒品战争”及其问题评析

19世纪未开始的美国禁毒运动主要以州或市为单位进行，《1914年哈里森麻醉品税法》颁布后，联邦层面上的禁毒活动方告正式启动。在半个世纪后，尼克松总统挟超级大国之威，以“毒品战争”（WaronDrugs）的全新禁毒理念，从外交、法治及治疗等方面对毒品施以全方位的围剿。至今仍在进行的“毒品战争”是美国百年禁毒史上的一个不可分割的阶段，给美国乃至整个国际社会禁毒运动都烙上了深刻的印记。无论其成败如何，观其成因并借鉴其经验与教训对制定今日的禁毒政策无疑具有重要的参考意义。     

与时俱进 开拓创新 推进禁吸戒毒工作新发展——巍山县公安局努力探索劳动康复戒毒新路子

四年多的禁吸戒毒工作,巍山县公安局做到了现有吸毒人员逐年减少,复吸率大幅度下降,戒断巩固率大幅度提高,禁吸戒毒工作成效显著。具体做法:1、宣传教育全面化;2、收戒吸毒人员制度化;3、帮教管理社会化;4、戒毒模式“劳动康复化”。     

刍议我国的行政性垄断问题

行政性垄断是我国在由计划经济体制向市场经济体制转变过程中产生的一种特有的经济现象,表现为,政府及其所属部门、经法律法规授权而具有行政管理权的企事业单位滥用行政权力不当地干预市场活动的行为,分为地区垄断和行业垄断.行政性垄断危害极大,我国应从法律和制度上对其危害性加以防范,以促进社会主义市场经济体制的形成和正常运作.