法律降低交易成本的机制分析

在法律的经济分析中 ,交易成本是一个重要的分析工具。要揭示法律降低交易成本的功能 ,首先要解决交易成本的计量问题。交易成本的计量应以交易成本与交易价值的比值来界定 ,以此得出交易成本与交易次数之间的关系 ,从而为法律的经济分析提供一个可靠的基础。     

在德国并购企业的融资相关法律问题——以三一重工并购德国普茨迈斯特有限责任公司为例

中国企业在德国并购涉及诸多层面:法律问题、企业经营问题、合理避税和融资财务问题。上述问题互相交融,互相制约,其中选择何种融资渠道和方式、如何在德国法律框架下构建合理交易结构是核心。本文以三一重工收购德国普茨迈斯特有限责任公司为例,试图还原并购细节,结合相关法律规定和融资技巧,探讨在德并购企业面临的法律风险及其规避之道。     

希伯来法中商业交易规范考辨

希伯来法是西方法律文明和英美法的源头之一,具有很高的研究价值.希伯来的商业交易规范是以《圣经》为法律渊源,源自习惯法则和宗教信仰,由此倡导契约守信观念和诚实无欺的贸易规则.从摩西时期的《圣经·旧约》到犹太教法典编纂时期的《塔木德》,商业交易规范形成与发展折射出希伯来商法的演变历程,也从一个侧面反映了西方商法成长的最初概貌,因此对其做一细致的考证,在外国法律史研究上颇有补正的功效.     

Cooperation,not cost savings: explaining duration of shared service agreements

Among local governments, inter-municipal cooperation is the growing reform; but the literature is silent regarding the determinants of longer-term shared service agreements. We conducted a survey of all local governments in New York State in 2013 to assess the level of sharing across 29 public services. The duration of shared service agreements varies from 1 to 80 years. What explains this difference? Our hierarchical linear model shows that service sharing agreements fall along a cooperation continuum, where cost savings are a determinant of shorter agreements, while the public values of service quality and cross-jurisdictional coordination explain longer-term agreements. We also find that positive past experience with sharing partners increases the duration of sharing agreements. Our analysis lays the foundation for new theories of shared services that build directly from the benefits of improved regional coordination, inter-municipal reciprocity and service quality, not from theories based solely on competition and costs.     

论当代交易安全保护制度

随着交易安全保护制度在当代逐步走向成熟,交易安全保护方法日趋多样化。现代交易安全制度不仅要保障履行利益的取得与实现,还要保障信赖利益的安全,包括缔约中的信赖保护和信息公开领域的信赖保护。在保护外观信赖时,或者按照当事人信赖的外观确认交易有效,或者直接要求当事人承担信赖利益赔偿责任;而对交易过程的保护,也实现了连贯与周密...     

基于多级价值评估的专利交易定价机制

为解决专利市场定价混乱、交易无序的问题，该文通过利用综合评价法及专利价值分析指标体系，构建基于多级价值评估的专利交易定价机制，并利用实际发生案例验证其合理性，科学准确地确定专利交易价格，拓宽专利交易渠道，从而规范专利交易市场，提高科技成果转化率，促进技术转移。     

夫妻财产隐名共有人权利保护的法律思考——一则妻子擅自卖房案引发的思考

夫妻显名方擅自处分共有产的类案中,法官们往往徘徊于交易第三人与事实物权人之间利益平衡之间。而这一利益平衡的过程,实则体现的是登记公信力与真实权利人保护的消长关系。法官的判断过程必须准确把握登记制度的本旨、婚姻家庭制度的价值取向和社会大众一般权利意识。在保护善意交易的同时,必须对恶意利用瑕疵登记进行交易的行为作出否定性的评价,以平衡真实权利人的权益。     

Sailing Towards the Brave New World of Zero Transaction Costs

The Coase Theorem is in essence an if-A-then-B statement. Previous discussions of the Theorem have mostly focused on the then-B part and examined that, given the condition of A, whether B is true or not. The present study attempts to analyze the Theorem from a different angle. In particular, we push the if-A assumption, i.e., the zero transaction costs assumption, to its logical limit, and then explore the implications. We argue that the price mechanism, which is implicitly employed as the foundational basis of the Coase Theorem, is the result of positive transaction costs. Consequently, if transaction costs are zero, then money and prices as commonly understood would not exist, and the value of production would become a vague concept without any operational content. As such, the world of zero transaction costs may be even more peculiar than Coase might have thought!     

物权变动模式之选择与交易安全

物权变动模式之争历时已数百年,交易安全在其中扮演着重要角色。但物权变动与交易安全是两个层面的问题,价值取向不完全一致,不应当合并在一起用一个规则来处理。意思主义的物权变动模式使物权变动和交易安全的问题都得到了较好解决,反对者所提出的诘难是不能成立的。