排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
本文从社会历史研究的角度剖析艾米莉·狄金森的自然诗作 ,指出狄金森笔下的自然对人类时而慈爱友善 ,时而充满敌意 ,既带给人类愉悦与和谐 ,又给人类以伤害。论文深入个人的、文化的和历史的背景 ,剖析造就这种矛盾的自然观的原因 ,从而揭示了困扰众多中国读者的“狄金森之迷” 相似文献
2.
拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生是19世纪美国著名作家、超验主义哲学家和美国文艺复兴的思想领袖。在他构建的超验主义思想体系中,既吸收了西方哲学中的精华部分,也积极的从中国古代哲学思想中汲取养料,接受儒家思想,并为己所用。虽未接触道家思想,却与之奇妙的契合,最终体现为以道家为体,以儒家为用的思维模式。 相似文献
3.
马克思主义哲学大众化对于马克思主义哲学的发展和我国社会主义的建设具有重要意义。在完成马克思主义哲学大众化的过程中,我们必须坚持马克思主义哲学世界图景的大众化和马克思主义哲学思维方式的大众化,以马克思主义哲学价值规范大众价值,从而完成马克思主义哲学大众化这一艰巨的历史任务。 相似文献
4.
5.
Richard J. Arneson 《Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy》2013,16(2):179-195
Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice (2009) mistakenly characterizes transcendental accounts of justice as being unable to compare non-ideal alternatives, and thus misfires as a criticism of Robert Nozick and John Rawls. In fact, Nozick’s disinterest in when rights may be overridden does not bespeak indifference to specific questions of comparative assessment, and Lockean rights do give determinate advice in everyday circumstances. Sen correctly reports that Rawls’s theory is defective at giving practical normative advice, but the basic problem is the over-rigidity of Rawls’s absolute priority relations, not transcendentalism. Sen’s search for a complete moral theory requires that he produce one. Act consequentialism is one promising complete theory of justice, having both transcendental grounding and clear methods for comparative assessment. I also propose moving from Sen’s capabilities standard of social justice to one based on functioning. The latter facilitates distinguishing between trivial and worthless capabilities and important and worthwhile ones, and focuses social justice more squarely on the end of well-being. 相似文献
1