独占控制制度中的结构规制模式与行为规制模式及对我国的启示

在反垄断法领域,结构规制模式与行为规制模式是独占控制制度的两种基本类型。根据我国的经济现状,结构规制模式的特点更符合当前反垄断控制的需要,而且也有利于促进反垄断立法的完善。     

论梅洛-庞蒂哲学中的三条岐义性路径

梅洛-庞蒂典型地体现了现代生存哲学对于近代主体形而上学的超越,但这并不意味着他完全告别了形而上学。梅洛-庞蒂正走在通向结构主义的途中,但他从未真正地远离现象学。这是一种在西方哲学史上具有含混地位的哲学,它在其对传统形而上学的深刻批判中依然守护着某些传统信念。     

Pierre Bourdieu: From Neo-Kantian to Hegelian Critical Social Theory

Abstract

This paper challenges the commonly made claim that the work of Pierre Bourdieu is fundamentally anti-Hegelian in orientation. In contrast, it argues that the development of Bourdieu's work from its earliest structuralist through its later ‘post-structuralist’ phase is better described in terms of a shift from a late nineteenth century neo-Kantian to a distinctly Hegelian post-Kantian outlook. In his break with structuralism, Bourdieu appealed to a bodily based logic of practice' to explain the binaristic logic of Lévi-Strauss' structuralist analyses of myth. Effectively working within the tradition of the Durkheimian approach to symbolic classification, Lévi-Strauss had inherited Durkheim's distinctly neo-Kantian understanding of the role of categories in experience and action—an account that conflated two forms of representation—‘intuitions’ and ‘concepts’—that Kant himself had held distinct. Bourdieu's appeal to the role of the body's dispositional habitus can be considered as a retrieval of Hegel's earlier quite different reworking of Kant's intuition-concept distinction in terms of distinct ‘logics’ with different forms of ‘negation’. Bourdieu commonly acknowledged the parallels of his analyses of social life to those of Hegel, but opposed Hegelianism because he believed that Hegel had remained entrapped within the dynamics of mythopoeic thought. In contrast, Durkheim and Lévi-Strauss, he claimed, by instituting a science of myth, had broken with it. This criticism of Hegel, however, relies on an understanding of his philosophy that has been rejected by many contemporary Hegel scholars, and without it, the gap separating Hegel and Bourdieu narrows dramatically     

形式作为内容——论文学的自我指涉性

关于文学形式自身的观点最终是关于生活的观点,自我指涉性最终归于指涉性。通过梳理从形式主义到结构主义对自我指涉性的理论探索,结论如下:对于形式主义者来说,自我指涉性主要是作为文本现象,而对结构主义者来说,则毋宁以其为批评眼光加于作品的结果。     

国际体系的稳定、变革与中国的和平发展

国际体系的稳定关键在于其结构层面。一个体系是否稳定,与体系中主要行为体的数量、主要行为体间力量对比关系、国际体系的调节机制等因素具有密切的联系。体系的变革既有体系内主要行为体力量发展不平衡、力量组合关系发生变动、主要行为体的对外战略发生重大调整等内在动因,也有全球化趋势发展等外在因素的催化作用。中国的和平发展并没有产生变革国际体系的要件,中国的和平发展并不会导致国际体系的剧烈动荡,而是将推动整个国际体系和平、渐进、稳定的转型。     

卡西尔历史观研究

在卡西尔看来,历史作为一种特殊的人类文化,存在一个更高的秩序,将一个个偶然的现实串联成我们熟知的历史。这个秩序就是人自我认识形式的归复与统一。真正的历史学以揭示人类生活及人类文化为目的,具有回顾和展望的双重意义,有助于人认识自我,回归人的世界。但卡西尔的历史观同样存在忽视偶然性因素、消解个人能动性的问题。历史学的研究,必须是围绕"人"开展的。福柯的结构主义历史方法是对其有效的补充。