试论计算机犯罪侦查取证的方法

由于计算机犯罪具有智能性、隐蔽性、跨地域性、以及资料易被篡改、销毁等特性,并且在侦查取证时技术复杂、要求较高,因而此类案件的侦查取证工作较之于传统案件相对困难。一方面要坚持和遵循传统侦查方法,另一方面在确定犯罪现场、勘察现场以及对数据证据的技术分析等方面,要根据计算机犯罪自身的特点和内在的规律找出有效的侦查方法。以打击计算机犯罪。     

公安档案的收集策略

公安档案的收集是公安档案管理的起点,因此,我们必须运用灵活多变的收集方法,对公安档案的收集工作实施切实有效的质量管控措施,研究收集的薄弱环节和空白点,从而提升公安档案收集的质量和水平。     

Memory and taste in the collections and households of the Spanish nobility (nineteenth and early twentieth centuries): an introduction to the topic with some notes on the house of Osuna and the origins of the period room

“Albeit democratic, their coat of arms has pride of place”. Thus Romualdo Nogués defined, in 1890, Spanish collectors of bourgeois origin who had joined the ranks of the aristocracy. A few years later, in 1924, the Duke of Alba’s maiden speech at the Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando justified his personal artistic worthiness on the basis of his ancestors’ collecting activities and the artworks they had amassed.

These two examples set the scene for the research questions studied in this monographic issue. The present introduction offers a bird’s eye view of the phenomenon and continues with a few remarks about the House of Osuna which, as is well known, occupied a pivotal position in Spanish nobility during the whole of the second half of the nineteenth century.     

证据法学研究用语不规范问题初探

法学研究强调逻辑的严谨性以及语言的规范性,作为法学分支学科的证据法学当然亦莫能外。但是,近年来方兴起的证据法学科,在我国开展的时日尚短,且一直与传统的证据学学科之间纠缠不清,以至于我国证据法学的学科体系迟迟不能建立,甚至连作为学科基础的基本概念都未能达成共识,缺乏统一性和规范性,理论研究和证据实务中用语不规范的问题一直存在,混用、误用基本概念和术语的现象较为普遍。这不仅影响到理论研究的严谨性,甚至干扰到实务操作的实效性。     

Windows NT/2000中电子证据的跟踪与提取

Windows TT是一种当前广泛应用的计算机网络操作系统,但其层出不穷的漏洞,也为入侵者打开了方便之门,使NT机的安全受到极大的威胁;在对Windows NT系统的种种攻击和破坏行为中,如何发现、跟踪与提取电子证据,是破获这类计算机犯罪案的关键;端口监控与检测、日志检测与审核、分析有关文件目录等是获取此类电子证据的有效方法。     

采集、供应血液、制作、供应血液制品事故罪的客体特征研究

本罪的犯罪客体是复杂客体，即国家对于采集、供应血液、制作、供应血液制品的管理制度和他人的健康权、生命权。     

公安院校计算机证据取证教育体系探讨

近年来我国才开始对计算机取证进行相关研究。建立相应的取证实验室,培养计算机取证专业人才,是高等院校特别是公安院校的迫切任务。1.建立计算机证据取证教育体系的建设原则;2.构建多层次的知识结构教育体系;3.静态取证与动态取证并重的教育教学;等。     

遏制非法收集证据的良策--试述非法证据排除规则

非法收集证据在我国刑事司法过程中尚未绝迹,法律规定上的缺陷使得非法收集的证据在法庭上得以使用和确认。因此,必须确立诉讼程序中非法证据排除规则。     

Exhibiting the collections of the Spanish Crown and nobility for the nation: the Count of Valencia de Don Juan and the 1892 European historical exhibition

This article focuses on the place and role accorded to the collections of the Spanish Crown and nobility at the Exposición Histórico-Europea organized in Madrid in 1892. It sets the exhibition in the political and cultural context of the Fourth Centenary of the Discovery of America and analyses the role of Juan Crooke y Navarrot, the Count of Valencia de Don Juan to understand how royal and aristocratic collections were instrumentalized in a bid to assert the place of the Spanish monarchy on the European and international scene and strengthen its prestige. Commissioner of Crown property, the Count of Valencia de Don Juan was one of the members of the nobility who exhibited their collections to the public. Therefore, his investment in the organization of the exhibition, as a non-professional curator, helps understand what the event meant for Spanish nobility. This enables us to gauge what role such exhibiting played in the construction of the national heritage and art historiography of Spain.     

论民事诉讼当事人的申请调查取证权

申请法院调查取证权是审判方式转型背景下民事诉讼法赋予当事人的一项重要权利。该项权利的实现有利于法院在发现真实的基础上保护当事人的合法民事权益和维护国家的民事法律秩序。目前民事诉讼法关于申请调查取证权的规定还过于原则,需要明晰该权利的构成要件,研究该权利在诉讼实务中的运作状况。修订《民事诉讼法》时,还应当制定用于调整行使这一权利所引发的利益冲突的具体规则。