To Wonderland Through the Looking-glass: Conceiving a Critical Legal Argument for Contractual Justice in the South African Law of Contract †

The aim of this paper is to identify the possible substructure (looking glass/es) of a critical legal argument for contractual justice (Wonderland) in the South African law of contract. South African contract law still fails, ten years after the constitutional transformation, to reflect the constitutional ideals of freedom, equality and human dignity in an acceptable manner. I argue that this disposition places a question mark over the legitimacy of contract law and marginalizes opportunities for the social change envisaged by the Constitution. The paper explores Duncan Kennedy’s Form and Substance-argument and indicates that the reluctance to accommodate these values may be attributable to the fact that the majority of role-players position themselves on the individualism/rules side of Kennedy’s continuum – a paradigm that perceives the law of contract as a body of positivistic rules to be applied neutrally and regardless of the social or socio-economic distortions its application may generate. In an attempt to move away from this traditional approach, the privileged paradigm is criticised. A typical CLS-approach is followed which employs sociology, psychological jurisprudence and game theory to criticise the law from outside the restrictive realms of law itself. Simultaneously, I attempt to illuminate the argument for a shift (step through the looking glass) to another paradigm. I conclude that our judiciary finds itself in a position similar to that of Plato’s prisoners in the cave and will not reach the point where they apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is thus responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing legislation to this effect in order to limit the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality to further the ideal of justice. Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial fulfilment of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual justice in the South African law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the Department of Legal History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and input: Karin van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge and thank the University of Cape Town for financially supporting this research. †Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial fulfilment of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual justice in the South African law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the Department of Legal History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and input: Karin van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge and thank the University of Cape Town for financially supporting this research. apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is thus responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing legislation to this effect in order to limit the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality to further the ideal of justice.     

多学科、兼顾历史与现状、教学相长：南洋研究院华人研究特点与存在问题（2000-2006）

南洋研究院的华侨华人研究体现了多学科、兼顾历史与现状、教学相长的特色。除了经济、历史、政治学(国际关系)等主要学科外,南洋院师生越来越多地借重民族学、宗教学、金融学、人口学、语言学、管理学、图书及版本学等学科理论与方法研究华侨华人。在侧重华侨华人现状研究时,仍继续关注华人史研究。在相关学位课程带动下,硕博生的学位论文研究日益成为南洋院华侨华人研究的重要组成部分。就总体而言,南洋院的华侨华人研究仍呈现创新能力弱、文献单薄、低水平重复等问题,这既是国内文科重量化考核导向的结果,也与研究人员浮躁的学术态度相关。     

邓小平、江泽民对毛泽东人民观的发展

邓小平和江泽民在领导我国人民进行改革开放和现代化建设的伟大实践中 ,深刻总结吸取了以往的经验教训 ,对社会主义建设时期的人民范畴作出了新分析 ,对社会主义制度下人民主体性的实现进行了新探索 ,还进一步丰富深化了为人民服务的思想 ,坚持和发展了毛泽东的人民观。     

试论毛泽东对中国传统民本思想的超越

毛泽东以马克思主义唯物史观为指导 ,批判地继承和吸收了中国传统民本思想的精华 ,加以改造创新 ,形成了毛泽东群众路线的观点 ,毛泽东在扬弃和超越中延续了中国传统文化的生命力。     

毛泽东人民政权理论的内蕴解析

毛泽东在革命和建设的一生中,为了实践共产党的根本宗旨,不懈地 探索适合中国国情的国家根本政治制度,并从实践上实行人民政权制度,形成了具 有中国特色的政治制度,为中国独立及人民的幸福缔造了根本制度,我们应该坚持 并随着时代发展不断完善这些制度。     

毛泽东的人民主体论

毛泽东的人民主体论思想内容极其丰富,主要包括人民是创造社会历史活动的主体,人民是认识的主体,人民是权利的主体,人民是革命和革命战争的主体,人民是监督的主体,人民是治理国家的主体等六个方面。     

毛泽东农业合作化思想探析

“农民、农村、农业”问题一直是我党在社会主义革命和建设中致力于解决的重大问题之一。在探索中国农业发展进程的过程中,毛泽东形成了他的农业合作化思想。分析研究毛泽东的农业合作化思想,不仅有助于我们更准确地理解毛泽东思想的历史发展过程,而且对于当代全面建设小康社会,建设有中国特色社会主义新农村具有重要的理论和实践意义。     

中日稻作起源研究回顾

1973年河姆渡遗址发现后,中日两国学者对稻作起源的研究有了突破性进展,对稻作起源年代的认定更为明确,尤其是两国学者对稻作起源区域的高度认同以及研究方法、内容上的互补,大大丰富了稻作文化的内涵。     

毛泽东对党的建设的伟大贡献

党的建设是一个伟大的历史过程，要推进党的建设新的伟大工程，必须对八十多年来党的建设的理论与实践进行认真的研究。而研究毛泽东对党的建设的伟大贡献对于加强和改进党的建设仍具有深远的意义。毛泽东对党的建设的伟大贡献主要表现在：着重从思想上、政治上和组织上建党，党的建设要与党的政治路线相联系，民主集中制是党的组织原则，要毫不动摇地坚持党的领导权，走群众路线。     

论毛泽东的民族自信心——纪念毛泽东诞辰110周年

毛泽东民族自信心的形成,是与中华民族传统文化和时代特征紧密联系的。毛泽东的民族自信心具有继承性、科 学性、人民性等特点,并在实践中得到不断发展。毛泽东民族自信心在中国革命和现代化建设中显示了巨大的威力,对我 们的工作和学习有重要启示。