首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再议“合一论”与“复合罪过说”
引用本文:李兰英.再议“合一论”与“复合罪过说”[J].现代法学,2005,27(4):74-78.
作者姓名:李兰英
作者单位:厦门大学法学院,福建,厦门,361005
摘    要:德国关于间接故意与有认识过失的合一论的主张与我国学者所提出的复合罪过的概念各有特定含义,“合一论”的罪过形式的出现有其特定的类型划分和观念为前提。复合罪过现象的原始含义不同于合一论。应该结合我国《刑法》分则的具体罪名来进行真正复合罪过形式的研究。

关 键 词:间接故意  有认识过失  合一论  复合罪过
文章编号:1001-2397(2005)04-0074-05
修稿时间:2004年12月6日

Re-discussing the "Theory of Unanimity" and "Compound Guilt"
LI Lan-ying.Re-discussing the "Theory of Unanimity" and "Compound Guilt"[J].Modern Law Science,2005,27(4):74-78.
Authors:LI Lan-ying
Abstract:By comparing the German doctrines of unanimity of indirect intent and cognitive negligence with the doctrine of compound guilty advanced by Chinese scholars,this author maintains that the given classification and conception is a precondition of the doctrine of compound guilt.This author further points out that the original meaning of compound guilt is different from the "theory of unanimity." So this author determines that we should conduct a laborious research on compound guilt based on the specific provisions of the Criminal Act of the PRC.
Keywords:indirect intent  cognitive negligence  the theory of unanimity  compound guilt
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号