首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

儒家心性论视阈下的“德育”思想论略——兼论“朱陆之争”
引用本文:王洁. 儒家心性论视阈下的“德育”思想论略——兼论“朱陆之争”[J]. 金陵法律评论, 2008, 0(6): 99-106
作者姓名:王洁
作者单位:南京师范大学国际文化教育学院副教授 博士,210097
摘    要:我们对儒家的“德育”思想有误解。事实上,儒家理解的“德育”应指一种“成德之教”,在根本的意义上,它是关于我们如何实现良心自觉的学问。儒家认为自觉的方法主要有两种:一是修身;一是教化。其根据是儒家所持有的独特的心性论。关于修身历来有“朱陆之争”,但事实上他们的不同只是一个强调在日常生活的具体道德实践中“逆觉体证”,一个强调通过格物、阅读经典等来觉悟而已,各有长短。同样,教化的根源性的方法是“启发”,它反映的人伦关系不是权力性的压制关系,而是出于一种天下一家、天下关怀的道德责任感;这种责任感恰恰反映了儒家积极性的人伦观。祛魅了这一人伦观,我们最终将无“家”可归。

关 键 词:心性论  德育  修身  教化  朱陆之争

The Ideology of Moral Education Viewed from the Perspective of the Confucian Theory of Mind-Nature:A Side Study on the Argument between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuzhou
WANG Jie. The Ideology of Moral Education Viewed from the Perspective of the Confucian Theory of Mind-Nature:A Side Study on the Argument between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuzhou[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2008, 0(6): 99-106
Authors:WANG Jie
Abstract:The Confucian ideology of Moral Education has been misunderstood.As a matter of fact,the moral education in Confucianism is supposed to be understood as a kind of moral cultivation,which is,fundamentally,about how we can realize conscience-oriented consciousness.Confucianism believes that there are mainly two ways to realize consciousness: one is self-cultivation and the other is education,which are based on the unique Mind-Nature Theory in Confucianism.With regard to self-cultivation,we are still facing th...
Keywords:Theory of Mind-Nature  moral education  self-cultivation  education  argument between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuzhou  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号