| 美国行政证据的可采性——兼论我国相关规则的建构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 韩春晖,刘新坤.美国行政证据的可采性——兼论我国相关规则的建构[J].法律与医学杂志,2011(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 韩春晖 刘新坤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学;宜春学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 美国行政证据的可采性标准具有多元性,其具体规则主次分明、相互关联,呈现出花开多枝、多姿多态的总体表征。我国行政证据可采性规则的独立建构应放弃建立单一标准的思路,而应当多层次立法,尝试具体规定以相对人主观因素为证明对象的证据排除规则、传闻证据排除规则、案卷排他性原则和品格证据排除规则在一定范围内的适用,以确立灵活多元的可采性标准。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政证据 可采性 行政过程 |
On the Admissibility of Administrative Evidence in America. |
| |
| Han Chunhui,Liu Xinkun.China University of Political Science , Law,Beijing ..On the Admissibility of Administrative Evidence in America.[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2011(1). |
| |
| Authors: | Han Chunhui Liu XinkunChina University of Political Science Law Beijing |
| |
| Institution: | Han Chunhui,Liu Xinkun.China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088. |
| |
| Abstract: | In America,There are many standards on the admissibility of administrative evidence.The Act,Statutory and Agency Regulation play different roles in the system and cooperate closely.In China,we should reconstruct the system of administrative evidence,especially prescribe diverse standards on the admissibility.In further,we should prescribe hearsay evidence exclusion rules,files exclusion rules and character evidence exclusion rules concretely. |
| |
| Keywords: | Administrativeevidence Admissibility Administrative process |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
