History in the Law of the Constitution |
| |
Authors: | J.W.F. Allison |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Universita Degli Studi Di Napoli ‘Federico II’ , Naples, Italy dolores.freda@unina.it |
| |
Abstract: | This article addresses the diminution of historical understanding in English constitutional law by reconsidering Dicey's approach to history in his foundational work. It argues that Dicey's approach was inconsistent and unconvincing – separating a historical view of an evolving constitution from a legal view, discounting history's legal significance and nonetheless repeatedly evoking a whig history to enhance the appeal of the constitution's rules and principles. It recalls the features or deficiencies of whig history, famously characterised by Herbert Butterfield from a modern historical perspective. To Butterfield's characterisation it adds an elaboration on their constitutional significance and a neglected comparative dimension. From those features, it develops, in conclusion, methodological suggestions for a history that might yet serve constitutional legal purposes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|