| 宪法修正案的合宪性审查:以印度为中心 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 柳建龙,韩大元. 宪法修正案的合宪性审查:以印度为中心[J]. 法学家, 2009, 0(1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 柳建龙 韩大元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国青年政治学院法律系; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为推介中国人民大学法学院博士培养成果,搭建论文品评乃至学术评价之平台,《法学家》自本期起专辟"博文精萃"一栏。该栏目由两部分组成:其一是"论文要旨",由博文作者对其博文进行全面系统而重点突出的介绍,一般宜包括如下要素:博文的体系架构;博文每章节的主要内容;博文的主要特点;博文的主要创新和不足;博文所研究领域的课题展望。其二是"论文评议",可以是答辩委员会的论文审查意见,或者评审专家的点评,具体宜包括如下要素:对论文的总体评价;对论文的体系及各章节的评价;对论文创新的评价;指出论文的不足以及进一步完善的方向。敬请关注并提出宝贵建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 最高法院 修宪权 司法审查权 宪法修正案 合宪性审查 基本特征 宪法条文 印度 |
Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments:India's Experiences |
| |
| LIU Jianlong,Ph.D.,the Lecturer of Law Department in China Youth University for Political Sciences.. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments:India's Experiences[J]. Jurists Review, 2009, 0(1) |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Jianlong Ph.D. the Lecturer of Law Department in China Youth University for Political Sciences. |
| |
| Affiliation: | LIU Jianlong,Ph.D.,the Lecturer of Law Department in China Youth University for Political Sciences. |
| |
| Abstract: | Judicial review of Constitutional Amendments,or to control the exercising of constituent power is highly disputed.In context of traditional doctrines of Constitutional Law,it is an exception of judicial review according to doctrine of political questions.However,in India doctrine of basic structures was evolved in order to meet the special political and social demands.The dissertation takes the history of judicial review of Constitutional Amendments,its theoretical grounds and tests and judging techniques i... |
| |
| Keywords: | Constitutional Amendments Judiciability Doctrine of Basic Structures |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
