首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对虚假陈述民事赔偿案件新司法解释的检讨
引用本文:涂斌华. 对虚假陈述民事赔偿案件新司法解释的检讨[J]. 天津市政法管理干部学院学报, 2003, 19(2): 3-7
作者姓名:涂斌华
作者单位:华东政法学院研究生院 上海200042
摘    要:最高人民法院2003年1月9日颁布了《关于审理证券市场因虚假陈述引发的民事赔偿案件的若干规定》,这一司法解释在我国第一次真正明确并且落实了证券民事赔偿责任和实现机制,对于我国证券法律体系的完善,证券市场投资人合法权益的保护具有里程碑意义。但是,该解释也存在许多不足,文章主要就该解释中责任赔偿依据、过错认定标准、责任适用原则、起诉条件、损失数额的计算方法和诉讼机制的几点不足提出自己的一点浅见。

关 键 词:请求权竟合  过错  连带责任  集团诉讼
文章编号:1008-8393(2003)02-0003-05
修稿时间:2003-03-08

Analysis on the Seven Major Defects of the New Judicial Explanation on Obligations Raised by Falsehood
TU Bin-hua. Analysis on the Seven Major Defects of the New Judicial Explanation on Obligations Raised by Falsehood[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law, 2003, 19(2): 3-7
Authors:TU Bin-hua
Abstract:The new Judicial Explanation on Obligations Raised by Falsehood Statemtnt issued by the Supreme Court on January 9th, 2003 is a milestone in the history of Chinese securities legislation. Meanwhile the explanation itself has some defects including but not limitted to the kind of responsibilities, criteria of fault, joint torts, calculation method for compensation etc. This article points them out and makes an analysis upon seven major defects hoping to promote Chinese securities legislation.
Keywords:concurrent claims  fault  joint and several liability  class suit  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号