论利益博弈中法官认证行为的规制

法官在关键证据的认定中会出现利益偏差并导致证据认定结论出现差异,这主要是对利益进行衡量的结果.利益衡量方法有助于提升法官的认证能力,但由于法官运用此方式的不规范性,因利益衡量偏差导致司法不公正的现象比较突出.利益衡量方法作为法学方法论,应当运用到法官证据认定环节.规范法官认证中的利益衡量应首先把握价值衡平方法,并在遵循一般规律的前提下依据不同诉讼形式分别采用不同的方法.

On Regulating Justice's Authenticating in Interest Gambling

When authenticating key evidences,because of interest deviation,there will be some difference in outcome.The way to weigh interest is beneficial to improve justice's ability of authenticating,but because of unnormative,deviation of weighing interest results in unfairness.As methodology of urisprudence, the way to weigh interest should be used in authenticating evidence.We should take the way of weighing value,in precondition of following universal law,according to different forms of action,we'd better adopt different ways.