| 紧急避险正当性根据研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘庸鲁. 紧急避险正当性根据研究[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2008, 0(5) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘庸鲁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 紧急避险不承担刑事责任已成共识,但对于紧急避险正当性根据还存在诸多争议。通过对阻却违法说、阻却责任说和综合说的对比和分析,得出以法益衡量说为基础、期待可能性说为补充的综合说是大陆法系紧急避险的正当性根据。而对于我国,考虑到犯罪构成体系和伦理规范,采用利益优越说解释紧急避险正当性根据不失妥当。
|
| 关 键 词： | 紧急避险 正当性 根据 |
Study on the Justness Basis of Necessity |
| |
| PAN Yong-lu. Study on the Justness Basis of Necessity[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2008, 0(5) |
| |
| Authors: | PAN Yong-lu |
| |
| Affiliation: | PAN Yong-lu |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a common sense that emergency action doesn't assume criminal responsibility,but there are still many disputations on the justness basis of emergency action.Through contrasting and analyzing different views,the paper reached the conclusion that justness basis of necessity is the synthesis theory which is based on the theory of evaluating the benefits of the law and is supplemented by the theory of anticipating probability.Considering crime constitution system and ethic norm,the theory of evaluating the benefits of the law is rational for China. |
| |
| Keywords: | emergency action justness basis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
