首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国有关行政犯性质的学说及其评析
引用本文:黄明儒. 我国有关行政犯性质的学说及其评析[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2004, 12(6): 47-54
作者姓名:黄明儒
作者单位:湘潭大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
摘    要:我国有倾向于质的差异说、倾向于量的差异说、倾向于质量差异说及双重性质说等四种较具代表性的行政犯性质学说。在我国,对行政犯性质的认定,则既要在立法上区分何种行为构成犯罪,何种行为仅构成秩序违反行为,又要在解释论上解决行政犯是否排除部分普通刑法总则的适用问题。

关 键 词:行政犯  量的差异说  质量差异说  双重性质说
文章编号:1004-9428(2004)06-0047-08
修稿时间:2004-09-12

Comments on Doctrines about the Nature of Administrative Offence in China
HUANG Ming-ru. Comments on Doctrines about the Nature of Administrative Offence in China[J]. journal of national prosecutors college, 2004, 12(6): 47-54
Authors:HUANG Ming-ru
Abstract:In our country, the scholars tend to support the following representative doctrine of the nature of administration offence:doctrine of quantitative difference, doctrine of qualitative difference, doctrine of both quality and quantitative difference, doctrine of double nature. In China, as far as the affirmation of the nature of administration offence is concerned, we are supposed to distinguish the concept of crime, the violation of social order legislatively, while making clear that whether administration offence is exclusive of the provisions in the criminal law in application.
Keywords:administrative offence  doctrine of quantitative difference  doctrine of qualitative difference  doctrine of double nature
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号