The Double Paradox of Juvenile Justice |
| |
Authors: | Ido Weijers |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Vakgroep Pedagogiek, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | This article considers the history of a century of juvenile justice. Illinois 'invented' the separate 'children's court' in 1899 and this concept was spearheaded in Northern America, Great Britain and continental Europe in the first decades of the new century. However, a century after its foundation the future of the juvenile court is in doubt everywhere in the Western world. Some conclude that there is a cyclical pattern in juvenile justice policies. That proposition is rejected in this article. The proposition of a cyclical pattern also presupposes that there is no real problem at stake in treating juvenile offenders. The main point of this article, however, is that juvenile justice cannot escape trying to solve a very complicated foundational issue. This issue is a double paradox, that is, juvenile justice has to solve two philosophical questions: the justification of punishment and the justification of punishment for non-adults. This diagnosis presents a new conceptual framework for an analysis of the history of juvenile justice. |
| |
Keywords: | history juvenile justice juvenile offenders legal philosophy youth court |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|