首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

管理主义与宪政主义:理论与利益的复合博弈
引用本文:刘伟红,钱美华. 管理主义与宪政主义:理论与利益的复合博弈[J]. 江南社会学院学报, 2007, 9(2): 60-65
作者姓名:刘伟红  钱美华
作者单位:1. 上海大学社会学院,上海,200444
2. 苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,江苏苏州,215021
摘    要:作为美国公共行政学的两大主体流派,管理主义和宪政主义的博弈自美国建国之初就已初现端倪。威尔逊的研究使公共行政学作为一门学科得以确立,他所确立的“公法执行”的学科定位同时奠定了管理主义作为公共行政理论发展主流的学科地位。而宪政主义正是不满于公共行政的执行地位以及公民资格的弱化而与管理主义的公共行政观展开了复杂的博弈,管理主义和宪政主义博弈的背后不仅仅是“效率”与“公正”的对立,还深刻演绎着理论阵营发展与现实利益发展的矛盾。

关 键 词:管理主义  宪政主义  美国  公共行政  效率  公平
文章编号:1673-1026(2007)02-060-06
修稿时间:2007-01-30

Managerialism and Constitutionalism: Complex Game between Theory and Interest
LIU Wei-hong,QIAN Mei-hua. Managerialism and Constitutionalism: Complex Game between Theory and Interest[J]. Journal of Jiangnan Social University, 2007, 9(2): 60-65
Authors:LIU Wei-hong  QIAN Mei-hua
Abstract:As the main two school of public administration,managerialism and constitutionalism have taken up their game since the beginning of the U.S..The public administration forming as an independent discipline was attributed to Wilson's studies.His discipline position of the public administration established managerialism as the mainstream station of the development of the public administration theory.Managerialism and constitutionalism took up their complicated game as constitutionalism was not satisfied with the carrying position of public administration and weakening of citizenship.The game is not only the embodiment of the opposition of justice and efficiency,but also the deduction of contradiction of between theory school development and realistic interests development.
Keywords:Constitutionalism  Managerialism  America  Public Administration  Efficiency  Justice
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号