首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

侦查机关强制采取物证比对样本的必要性及合法化路径研究
引用本文:李学军,张卫萍,张吉林.侦查机关强制采取物证比对样本的必要性及合法化路径研究[J].证据科学,2009,17(2):210-223.
作者姓名:李学军  张卫萍  张吉林
作者单位:1. 中国人民大学法学院
2. 黑龙江公安厅刑事技术总队
基金项目:北京市刑事侦查学研究会研究项目 
摘    要:本文讨论了刑事侦查中强制采取物证比对样本的必要性以及立法规制这种强制活动的必要性,探究了强制采样的合法化路径。认为法律应明确侦查机关有权依照必要性原则、适当性原则和比例原则在侦查中强制采取物证比对样本,并就强制采样的主体、对象、程序等问题作出具体规定,否则,就有可能侵犯相关人员的基本人权。

关 键 词:强制采取物证比对样本  物证鉴定  合法化

On the Necessity and Legitimization Route of Compulsory Collection of Comparative Samples of Physical Evidence in Criminal Investigation
Li Xuejun,Zhong Weiping,Zhang Jilin.On the Necessity and Legitimization Route of Compulsory Collection of Comparative Samples of Physical Evidence in Criminal Investigation[J].Evidence Science,2009,17(2):210-223.
Authors:Li Xuejun  Zhong Weiping  Zhang Jilin
Institution:Li Xuejun, Zhang Weiping, Zhang Jilin.(1.Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872; 2. The Public Security Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150001)
Abstract:This article discusses the necessity of compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence in criminal investigation, the necessity of regulating the compulsory action by legal provisions and explores the legitimization route of compulsory collection of comparative samples. This author points out that our Criminal Procedure Law should explicitly provide the criminal investigation organs' power to collect comparative samples of physical evidence in accordance with three basic principles: necessity, balance and proportionality. And the Law should have particular rules to regulate the compulsory action's subject, object and procedure. Otherwise, there is possibility of violating the related human rights.
Keywords:Compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence  Physical evidence au- thentication  Legitimization
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号