首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

侵犯知识产权犯罪案件情况与法律适用问题调查
引用本文:闫艳,秦天宁,谢杰. 侵犯知识产权犯罪案件情况与法律适用问题调查[J]. 福建公安高等专科学校学报, 2010, 0(1): 81-86
作者姓名:闫艳  秦天宁  谢杰
作者单位:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042 [2]上海市静安区人民检察院,上海200042 [3]上海市宝山区人民检察院,上海201900
摘    要:侵犯知识产权犯罪案件在实体法适用层面存在共犯认定规则不统一,单位犯罪司法认定存在偏差,知识产权犯罪交叉竞合定性差异较大,数额认定争议较大等问题。在程序法适用层面存在管辖设置不尽合理,调查取证困难,涉外程序规则缺失,被害人(单位)提供假冒产品鉴定证明的法律效力存在瑕疵等问题。有必要通过知识产权犯罪刑法解释的优化以及程序操作规范的完善,以应对知识产权犯罪法律适用过程中出现的疑难问题。

关 键 词:侵犯知识产权犯罪  调查  法律适用  对策

The Settlement of Intellectual Property Crimes and Legal Application Investigation
YAN Yan,QIN Tian-ning,XIE Jie. The Settlement of Intellectual Property Crimes and Legal Application Investigation[J]. The Study of Social Public Security, 2010, 0(1): 81-86
Authors:YAN Yan  QIN Tian-ning  XIE Jie
Affiliation:1. East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China ; 2. People' s Procuratorate of Shanghai Jingan District, Shanghai 200042, China ;3. People' s Procuratorate of Shanghai Baoshan District, Shanghai 200042, China)
Abstract:There are some difficulties on the substantial legal application of intellectual property crimes, such as disunity of complicity cognizance rules, windage of corporate crime judgements, disputions of crime amounts verdicts and so on. There are also some problems in the procedural legal application of intellectual property crimes, such as irrational setting of jurisdiction, investigations and legal force of victim's counterfeit identifications and so on. It is absolutely important to optimize criminal law interpretations and procedural operations.
Keywords:intellectual property crimes  survey  legal application  stratagems
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号