首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

通谋虚伪行为探析
引用本文:王群,赟斌.通谋虚伪行为探析[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2010(1):101-106.
作者姓名:王群  赟斌
作者单位:山东大学法学院,山东济南250100
摘    要:我国关于“恶意串通”、“以合法形式掩盖非法目的”的规定,是我国对大陆法系中“通谋虚伪行为”理论所做的变通。但是这种变通不仅未取得预期的效果,反而极易导致适用上的随意性,从而造成法的不安定,损害交易安全。因此我国应取消这一变通,还原“通谋虚伪行为”的本来面目。值得欣慰的是,我国已经出台的两部《民法典》草案中均有“虚伪表示”的内容,这必将促进我国民事立法的进步。

关 键 词:大陆法系  通谋虚伪行为  恶意串通

Analysis of Tung Mou Hypocrisy
WANG Qun,YUN Bin.Analysis of Tung Mou Hypocrisy[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2010(1):101-106.
Authors:WANG Qun  YUN Bin
Institution:(School of Law, Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)
Abstract:The provisions about "malicious collusion" and"a legal form of a shield for illegal purposes" are modifications of"tong mou hypocrisy" theory of the civil law system. But these modifications not only failed to achieve the desired results, but also easily lead to the randomicity of application, resulting in in- stability of the law and undermining the safety of transactions. Therefore, we should abolish these modifi- cations and restore the "tung mou hypocrisy" as it is. What is gratifying is that China has already issued two "Civil Code'drafts,both including "hypocritical" theory, which will promote the progress of our civil legislation.
Keywords:the civil law system  tung mou hypocrisy  malicious collusion
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号