首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅析扒窃型盗窃罪着手之认定
引用本文:张宁.浅析扒窃型盗窃罪着手之认定[J].安徽警官职业学院学报,2014(1):44-48.
作者姓名:张宁
作者单位:中国青年政治学院 法学院,北京,100089
摘    要:《刑法修正案(八)》将扒窃规定为独立的定罪行为,因此使得扒窃犯罪成为盗窃罪的特殊行为类型。扒窃型盗窃罪着手的认定需要在坚持实质客观说的基础上通过时间和空间要素进行综合判断。只有当行为的实施对被害人财产法益具有现实而紧迫的危险时,才是扒窃犯罪的实行行为。具体而言,行为人为实施扒窃所进行的"试探行为",已经使得被害人的财物处于随时脱离占有的状态,对被害人的财产法益产生了紧迫的危险。但"试探行为"不能作广义的理解,只能是具有侵害财产法益紧迫危险的行为。

关 键 词:扒窃  实质客观说  试探行为

The Identification of Starting to Commit Crime of the Pick-pocketing Theft
Zhang Ning.The Identification of Starting to Commit Crime of the Pick-pocketing Theft[J].Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers,2014(1):44-48.
Authors:Zhang Ning
Institution:Zhang Ning (Law school, China Youth University for Political Sciences, Beijing 100089)
Abstract:The relevant provisions to the Eighth Criminal Law Amendment regulate the pick-pocketing thefts, which makes it a special type of larceny. Determination of pick-pocketing theft needs a comprehensive judgment through time and space elements on the basis of the substantive objectivism. Only when the act of the property law is a realistic and urgent danger, it can be seen as the crime. Specifically, the implementation of human behavior of pick-pocketing "exploratory behavior", has made the victim's property out of possession at any time, and brought imminent danger to the legal interest of the victim's property. But "exploratory behavior" can not be understood in a broad sense, and it belongs to an urgent dangerous behavior which only has violated the legal interest of property.
Keywords:pick-pocketing theft  the substantive objectivism  exploratory behavior
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号