| 法院错案追究制度的困境分析与重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李卫红,李莹莹.法院错案追究制度的困境分析与重构[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2007,16(5):55-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李卫红 李莹莹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国青年政治学院,中国,北京,100089;中国青年政治学院,中国,北京,100089 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法院错案追究制度因欠缺运作上的效果支持,并且存在诸如错案的标准不明确、错案追究的主体不科学、错案追究的依据不合理等理论上不可克服的障碍,产生了损害法官独立性的司法负效应。因此,应以法官任职保障制度(尤其是法官豁免制度)和法官惩戒制度取代之。
|
| 关 键 词： | 错案追究制度 法官惩戒制度 法官任职保障制度 |
Analysis of the Discomfiture and Reconstruction of Courts' Misjudged-case-investigating Mechanism |
| |
| LI Wei-hong,LI Ying-ying.Analysis of the Discomfiture and Reconstruction of Courts' Misjudged-case-investigating Mechanism[J].Journal of Henan Public Security Academy,2007,16(5):55-60. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Wei-hong LI Ying-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | The misjudged-case-investigating mechanism was implemented to be on guard and punishment in courts' system since 1992,but its effects in operation are disappointed.The article puts emphasis upon the drawbacks of the misjudged-case-investigating mechanism jurisprudentially,such as the blurry standards of misjudged case,the unreasonable legal bases for imputation,and so on.For the destructive impacts in the aspect of judicial independence especially,the authors suggest putting judge-punishment mechanism and judge-protection mechanism instead. |
| |
| Keywords: | The courts' misjudged-case-investigating mechanism Judge-punishment mechanism Judge-protection mechanism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
