车内空气有害物质超标侵权的举证责任

车内空气有害物质超标致人损害构成产品侵权,而不是环境污染侵权。在该类案件中,受害人很难跳出败诉的风险圈,原因在于现行法律对产品缺陷、缺陷与损害之间的因果关系证明并没有规定适用举证责任倒置,于是,受害人面对高难度的缺陷和因果关系证明,无可避免地以败诉告终。因此,产品侵权的举证责任分配规则应变革,实行举证责任倒置,由被告证明产品不存在缺陷、产品缺陷和损害事实之间不存在因果关系。

Burden of Proof of Infringement of Harmful Substance in Vehicle Air

That harmful substances in Vehicle air exceeding the criterion causes damage to persons constitutes a product of the infringing,not infringement of environmental pollution.In this type of cases,the victim is difficult to escape from the risk of losing a lawsuit.The reason is that current laws do not stipulate the application of inversion of the burden of proof in proving the causality between the defective products and damages.Therefore,victims will inevitably losing the lawsuit due to the difficult proving...