首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重审与重判的法文化分析
引用本文:刘家梅. 重审与重判的法文化分析[J]. 河北法学, 2004, 22(3): 106-109
作者姓名:刘家梅
作者单位:中南民族大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430074
摘    要:西方的当事人主义诉讼模式审判重审 ,中国职权主义诉讼模式审判重判。立足于比较法律文化 ,认为重审与重判只是相比较而言的 ,究竟是重审还是重判是两种不同的文化传统、不同的价值取向所造成的 ,是有其深厚的法律文化基础的 ,是渊源流长的法律文化所塑造的。当代中国司法制度的建设和完善 ,审判制度的变革和发展应以与时代精神相一致的法治文明建设为基础 ,以人权保障、正当程序、司法公正为目的 ,形成制度化、理性化、规范化的审理与裁判并重的机制

关 键 词:审判  重审  重判  法文化
文章编号:1002-3933(2004)03-0106-04
修稿时间:2003-10-13

Analyze of Legal Culture about Retrial and Renewed Judgment
LIU Jia-mei. Analyze of Legal Culture about Retrial and Renewed Judgment[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2004, 22(3): 106-109
Authors:LIU Jia-mei
Abstract:The judgment of party doctrine litigant mode emphasizes particularly on inquisition in the west, but the judgment of authority doctrine litigant mode focuses on verdict in China. Through comparing the different law culture, in the author's opinions, the different culture tradition and different worth viewpoint result in the two kinds of different results, which are based on their respective deep law culture. In China, the perfect and development of judicial system and the innovation of judgment system should be based on the legal system civilization which is accordance with the Zeitgeist and the purpose are human rights guarantees, the justice process and judicatory justness. Meanwhile, come into being a mechanism in which both the inquisition and the verdict are the equal important.
Keywords:judgment  retrial  renewed judgment  legal culture
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号