Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered |
| |
Authors: | Joshua J. Dyck,Edward L. Lascher Suffix" >Jr. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Political Science Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA;(2) Department of Public Policy and Administration, California State University Sacramento, Sacramento, CA 95819-6081, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Some studies have contended that direct democracy has secondary benefits unrelated to its impact on policy. In particular, recent scholarship claims that the American ballot initiative process enhances political efficacy. We began with concerns about the logic and empirical methods underlying this conclusion. We connect this research to the broader political psychology literature and in doing so find little reason to expect a positive relationship between direct democracy and efficacy. Our other contribution is to subject the empirical claim to more extensive testing. In contrast to prior research, we draw from multiple data sources and consider sampling methods. The results consistently fail to indicate that direct democracy generally enhances political efficacy. We find cause for skepticism about the secondary benefits of the ballot initiative process. |
| |
Keywords: | Direct legislation Ballot initiatives Political efficacy |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|