首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

Listen to the Judge or Listen to the Facts?——On the exclusionary rule
引用本文:裴苍龄.Listen to the Judge or Listen to the Facts?——On the exclusionary rule[J].河北法学,2012,30(6):32-33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42.
作者姓名:裴苍龄
作者单位:西北政法大学,陕西西安,710063
摘    要:证据是认识的基础、证明的根据、检验的标准、思想的指南.什么能当此重任?惟有事实.证据是事实,事实不存在非法、合法的问题.事实是客观的,既不受法律调整,也不受法律制约,因而证据也没有合法性.证据不能排除.排除证据的实质是法官睁着眼睛不认事实,排除证据的法官把自己和事实的位置摆错了,这是一项根本性的错误.非法获取人证是司法警察通过刑讯逼供和指名问供这样两重罪行实现的,因而它不是程序,而是程序中的实体.

关 键 词:证据  排除  刑讯逼供  指名问供

Listen to the Judge or Listen to the Facts? ——On the exclusionary rule
PEI Cang-ling.Listen to the Judge or Listen to the Facts? ——On the exclusionary rule[J].Hebei Law Science,2012,30(6):32-33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42.
Authors:PEI Cang-ling
Institution:PEI Cang-ling ﹙Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710063 China﹚
Abstract:Evidance is the basis for cognition and testification,the standard of inspection,and the guide of thinking. Whatcan becom e a burden?O nly the facts. Prooves are facts,while there are no legal or illegalquestions for facts as facts are objective,neither subject to legal regulation nor subject to legal constraints. Therefore,there are no legal questions for prooves. Nor can prooves be ruled out. If a judge would exclude any evidance,it merely means the judge had shut his eyes up before the facts. Such a judge had misplaced prooves and him self,which is a big mistake. Illegally obtaining witness is realized eigherthrough torturing the suspectto extractconfessions orthrough asking fora crime by name for such crimes by the police. O bviously,both conducts are illegitimate. So illegally obtaining witness is the substance ofa procedure rahter than the procedure itself.
Keywords:evidance  exclude  torturing the suspectto extractconfessions  asking for a crime by name
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号