| HaeⅢ和HinfⅠ酶解DNA指纹图的比较——一例乱伦案的亲子鉴定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁焰,叶健,李伯龄,倪锦堂. HaeⅢ和HinfⅠ酶解DNA指纹图的比较——一例乱伦案的亲子鉴定[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 1991, 0(4) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁焰 叶健 李伯龄 倪锦堂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 公安部第二研究所 北京100038 |
| |
| 摘 要： | <正> DNA指纹技术已经在法医生物物证鉴定中被日益广泛地应用。从理论上说,两种不同的限制性内切酶酶解同一个体DNA产生完全不同的指纹图,虽有这方面的一般性报道,但无进一步的研究。作者用α—珠蛋白-3’HVR探针比较了HinfI和HaeⅢ酶解的DNA指纹图,并将此结果应用于案例鉴定,报道如下。
|
| 关 键 词： | DNA fingerprint Patennity test α-globin-3'HVR probe HaeⅢ digests HinfI digestsion |
COMPARISON OF DNA FINGERPRINTS BETWEEN Hae Ⅲ AND Hinf Ⅰ DIGESTS |
| |
| Ding Yan,Ye Jian,Li Boling,Ni Jintang Instiitute of Forensic science,Ministry of public securitry,Beijing. COMPARISON OF DNA FINGERPRINTS BETWEEN Hae Ⅲ AND Hinf Ⅰ DIGESTS[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine, 1991, 0(4) |
| |
| Authors: | Ding Yan Ye Jian Li Boling Ni Jintang Instiitute of Forensic science Ministry of public securitry Beijing |
| |
| Affiliation: | Ding Yan,Ye Jian,Li Boling,Ni Jintang Instiitute of Forensic science,Ministry of public securitry,Beijing 100038 |
| |
| Abstract: | DNA fingerprints of Hae Ⅲ digestion,were compared with that of HinfI digestion using α-globin-3'HVR as probe.The results showed that both probabili- ty of associati on chance of each band were 0.21.The fragment number of HinfI digest was 16.8 while that of Hae Ⅲ digests was 13.6.A paternity case was tested using both DNA fingerprints,the plausibity of paternity was 99.998%. |
| |
| Keywords: | DNA fingerprint Patennity test α-globin-3'HVR probe HaeⅢ digests HinfI digestsion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
