The gendered construction of expert discourse: An analysis of psychiatric evaluations in criminal court |
| |
Authors: | Danielle Laberge Daphené Morin Victor Armony |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | According to critical literature, psychiatrization is a central feature of gendered social control. It operates in a twofold process: by orienting women to medical institutions rather than the penal system, and, for those women who do enter the criminal justice system, by favoring an interpretation of their behavior in terms of mental health problems. However, the production of gendered social control cannot be reduced to institutional decision-making; it also leaves its traces in various discursive forms. One such form is forensic psychiatrists' discourse on the offenders they evaluate. Our study analyzes these forensic reports as units of a computerized database. Our goal is to gain insight into the text by means of systematic quantitative and qualitative procedures. Even though the expert discourse is shaped by specifications requested by the court, the discourse examined here constructs two very distinct identities that do not correspond to stereotyped conceptions about femininity and masculinity. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|