首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

第三人侵害债权制度研究
引用本文:赵莉,刘锟. 第三人侵害债权制度研究[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2002, 0(Z1)
作者姓名:赵莉  刘锟
作者单位:苏州大学法学院 江苏苏州215021(赵莉),苏州大学法学院 江苏苏州215021(刘锟)
摘    要:本文认为 ,债之相对性虽是债法的基础 ,但第三人若恶意侵害债权 ,在符合一定条件时 ,应当保障债权人对第三人的侵权损害赔偿请求权。文章结合我国的现状从侵害债权的构成要件、类型、责任承担等方面进行了阐述 ,指出我国应当建立第三人侵害债权制度 ,但主观上应仅限于直接故意。

关 键 词:债之相对性  第三人  损害  故意

Study on the Third Party''''s lmfringement of the Creditor''''s Rights
ZHAO Li,LIU Kun. Study on the Third Party''''s lmfringement of the Creditor''''s Rights[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2002, 0(Z1)
Authors:ZHAO Li  LIU Kun
Abstract:In the author's, the relativity of obligation is the basis of the law of obligation. However, in case that a third party maliciously infringes obligatory rights, the creditor's right of claim to the third paryt for damage should be guaranteed by law in certain conditions. Combining the present legislative situation of our state, this article analyses the institution of infringement of obligatory right by a third party in aspects of constructive conditions, types of infringement, undertaking f liabilities, ect. It also poingts out this institution should be estalshed in our legislation, but the subjective condition should be set in the scope of direct malice.
Keywords:relativity of obligation  a third party  damage  malice
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号