民事诉讼侵害阻断制度释义及其必要性分析

在诉请法院判令对方当事人履行特定行为义务的诉讼中，传统的作法是必须待到判决确定后才能对侵害行为采取措施。在此前，无论是法院还是权利人均没有权利制止侵害的继续发生。这种做法会使权利人的利益蒙受巨大的损失，也会造成社会资源的浪费。因此，有必要针对诉讼中发生的侵害设立阻断侵害以保全现状的制度，避免权利人遭受难以弥利、的损失。我国现行有关侵害阻断的规定，大多属于应急性措施，立法界对其必要性缺乏足够的认识，理论界既有的研究成果中对该项制度的本质与特征也存在着误解。

The Interpretation and Necessity Analysis of Interdiction on Infringement in Civil Procedure

In litigation proceedings where the court is asked to order the opposing party to perform a specific obligation, the traditional way is to take action against any infringement only after the judgment is made. Before this, neither the court nor the involving party seeking to enforce his rights (the "claimant") has the right to apply for an order to discontinue the infringement. This not only causes the claimant to suffer great loss, but also leads to the waste of social resources. Therefore, it is necessary ...