The grapes of rent: A history of renting in a country of owners |
| |
Authors: | Donald A. Krueckeberg |
| |
Affiliation: | Professor of Urban Planning and Policy Development at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy , Rutgers University |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract In a recent study of neighborhood development, Goetz and Sidney (1994) found an “ideology of property” separating the interests of homeowners from the interests of lower‐income tenants. According to this ideology, owners are better citizens than renters, and therefore public policy should benefit owners at the expense of renters. In spite of continuing research that shows this allegation to be false, a widespread bias against renters persists. Why is this so? A deliberate bias favoring property owners and harming renters has been prominent in American public policy from colonial times to the present, although its exact form has varied over time—property requirements for suffrage, land redistribution schemes promising ownership but delivering tenancy and poverty, and tax policies that privilege ownership and punish tenancy. Public policy that stigmatizes renters represents a bias as pernicious as other biases of gender, race, religion, and nationality. |
| |
Keywords: | Rental housing Property Tax policy |
|
|