首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Defining risk
Authors:Baruch Fischhoff  Stephen R. Watson  Chris Hope
Affiliation:(1) MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, Great Britain;(2) Decision Research, A Branch of Perceptronics, 1201 Oak Street, 97401 Eugene, Oregon, USA;(3) Emmanuel College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Great Britain;(4) Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Great Britain
Abstract:Risk is the focal topic in the management of many activities and technologies. For that management to be successful, an explicit and accepted definition of the term ldquoriskrdquo is essential. Creation of that definition is a political act, expressing the definers' values regarding the relative importance of different possible adverse consequences for a particular decision. Those values, and with them the definition of risk, can change with changes in the decisionmaker, the technologies considered, or the decision problem. After a review of the sources of controversy in defining risk, a general framework is developed, showing how these value issues can be systematically addressed. As an example, the approach is applied to characterizing the risks of six competing energy technologies, the relative riskeness of which depends upon the particular definition used.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号