对侵犯著作权罪立法的几点思考

实体法上,侵犯著作权罪的构成要件中“以营利为目的”不必要,以行为人侵犯著作权的违法所得数额作为定罪量刑的主要标准不利于对侵犯著作权犯罪的有效打击。法定刑的设定不够合理。程序法上侵犯著作权罪是否属于亲告罪类型的自诉案件不太明确,文章认为设定成刑法上的亲告罪还不如设定成为刑诉法第170条(三)所规定的可予自诉的案件。

Be legislative to the invasion work power offense of what time thinking

On the entity method,infringe upon "take make money as a purpose" in the composing important item of the work power offense need not want,the behavior is infringe upon by person illegal income quantity conduct and actions of the work power sentence penal main standard disadvantage of quantity in to the valid stroke that infringes upon the work power crime.The law provision offense is penal to set not enough reasonableInfringe upon whether the work power offense belong to tell the offense type in person or not on the procedure method of from tell case not too definitely,the article thinks the enactment becomes in person tell of the penal code offense's still setting to become what the code of criminal court Article 170s(three) rule rather can to from tell of case.