Equity and Conscience |
| |
Authors: | Macnair Mike |
| |
Affiliation: | *Fellow of St Hugh's College, University of Oxford. |
| |
Abstract: | This article argues that the peculiarly common law traditionseparation of common law and equity had at its origins a principledbasis in the concept of conscience. But consciencehere did not mean primarily either the modern lay idea, or theconscience of Christopher St German's exposition.Rather, it referred to the judge's, and the defendant's, privateknowledge of facts which could not be proved at common law becauseof medieval common law conceptions of documentary evidence andof trial by jury. The concept of a jurisdiction peculiarly concernedwith this issue allowed the English bill procedureto be held back to a limited subject area rather than—asin Scotland and the Netherlands—overwhelming the old legalsystem. By the later 17th century, however, the concept of consciencehad lost its specific content, leaving behind the problem, stillwith us, of justifying the separation of equity. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|