英国非法证据的处理规则与我国非法证据取舍的理性思考

在英国，证据本身的非法性对证据的可承认性不存在必然和直接的影响，法官所关注的是证据本身的证明价值和它对诉讼的正面意义，故对非法证据的处理实际倾向于适用或总体上适用为原则。而在这一总的原则之下，又通过设置非法证据应具有真实性和其适用不损害实质意义的程序正义的两个限制性条件，确保非法证据适用的安全性、英国这一非法证据的处理规则对我国具有重要的借鉴和参考价值：一方面其符合我国司法运作的低水平现状，具有较强的实用性和可操作性；另一方面也具有科学性和合理性。因此，我国应在坚持非法证据总体适用的原则下，确立排除非法证据的标准。

A Rational Consideration of the Rule Governing Illegal Evidence in U.K. and the Accepatance Rule in China

In England, the illegality of evidence doesn't cause direct and necessary influence on its acceptance. What the judges concern is the positive effect on litigation and the evident value. Thus, the rule governing illegal evidence in fact tends to or in general to adapt it. Under this general principle, judges also set two restrictive conditions-being true and its application will not do harm to its procedural justice-to ensure such evidence's safety. The author thinks that English rule governing such illegal evidence can be as an example for China: oil one side. this is suitable for China's low-level Judicial operation at present, because of practicality and flexibility. One the other side, it has its scientific and reasonable elements. We should set up our standard of the acceptance rule governing such illegal evidence oil condition that such evidence is applicable in general.