首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两大法系法制完善主要方式比较研究
引用本文:张从容. 两大法系法制完善主要方式比较研究[J]. 西安政治学院学报, 2001, 14(5): 51-54
作者姓名:张从容
作者单位:暨南大学,法学系,广东,广州,510000
摘    要:成文法以填充的方式实现对法制的完善,判例法以生长的方式实现对法律的完善,这两种方式都各有优缺点.实践中,西方两大法系采取将成文法与判例法有机混合的方式来实现对法制完善.由于起主导作用的法律传统的影响,成文法和判例法在两大法系国家法制完善的具体过程中所起的作用与地位是有所不同的.两大法系的实践证明成文法与判例法的适当结合是完善法制的有效手段.

关 键 词:成文法  判例法  法制完善
文章编号:1008-5815(2001)05-0051-04
修稿时间:2001-04-15

Comparative Analysis on the Two Major Perfecting Ways of Legal System in Civil-law System and Anglo-American Law System
ZHANG Cong rong. Comparative Analysis on the Two Major Perfecting Ways of Legal System in Civil-law System and Anglo-American Law System[J]. Journal of Xi'an Politics Institute, 2001, 14(5): 51-54
Authors:ZHANG Cong rong
Abstract:To perfect legal system,statute law fills the blanks of law with codes,regulations,principles and legal concepts,while case law depending on the growth of the precedent.Having realized the limitation of the single method,civil law countries and Anglo American law countries combine the two methods organically.It is necessary to point that in the context of the dominant legal tradition,the function and status of statute law and case law are different in practice in civil law countries and Anglo American countries.The conclusion is that the organic combination of the two methods can make the legal system more perfect effectively.
Keywords:statute law  case law  legal perfection  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号