渎职侵权犯罪因果关系问题实证研究

透过近年来反渎职侵权办案实践，渎职侵权犯罪案件因果关系呈现出渎职侵权行为直接导致渎职侵权犯罪本身结果的发生较少；渎职行为直接导致另一普通刑事犯罪案件的发生占有较大的比例；渎职侵权职务犯罪案件多因一果的现象比例较高：不作为及不认真履行职责导致渎职侵权职务犯罪危害后果发生情况的比例略高：考量危害结果中的经济损失都是认定为直接经济损失等特点当前司法实践中，由于存在因果关系理论不统一：对渎职侵权因果关系的法律规范缺失；渎职侵权行为责任分散和模糊；对渎侦办案人员实行通才管理体制等问题,严重影响了渎职侵权犯罪因果关系的依法正确认定。应当用传统刑法学因果关系理论作为认定渎职侵权犯罪因果关系的理论基础并立法规范化；引入和参照共同犯罪理论；多渠道加强办案人员的分类专业建设：上提一级该罪的立案侦查权等，以促进对渎职侵权犯罪因果关系的依法正确认定。

Empirical Study of Causality in Infringement of Dereliction of Duty

According to the research on practice of taking charge of infringement of dereliction of duty,the infringement behaviors often do not directly lead to the infringement of dereliction of duty but other criminal cases.In the process of handling such cases,it tends to find that negative or careless behavior is the main reason causing the crime.Disunity of causality,lack of legal norm and diffusion of responsibility has had serious impact on legally recognizing the causality of the infringement of dereliction of duty.Therefore,it is expected to introduce the traditional criminal causality as theoretical foundation,refer to complicity theory,upgrade the right of placing a case on file for investigation,and finally promote its legal and correct recognition