首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

第三人欺诈与民事行为效力瑕疵--来自比较法角度的观察与评析
引用本文:张淳.第三人欺诈与民事行为效力瑕疵--来自比较法角度的观察与评析[J].江苏行政学院学报,2005(5):101-106.
作者姓名:张淳
作者单位:南京大学,法学院,南京,210093
摘    要:能够成为民事行为效力瑕疵的第三人欺诈将导致民事行为无效或者被撤销。就这种欺诈而言,法国法认为其不能够成为民事行为效力瑕疵;德国法认为其在对方当事人知道或应当知道其存在的情形下即能够成为民事行为效力瑕疵;意大利法则认为其无论对方当事人是否知道其存在均能够成为民事行为效力瑕疵。我国法对此问题的看法在实际上相同于意大利法,但有关立法中的不合理因素应当予以克服。

关 键 词:第三人欺诈  民事行为效力瑕疵  无效民事行为  可撤销的民事行为
文章编号:1009-8860(2005)05-0101-06
修稿时间:2005年6月28日

The Third Party's Fraud and Defects of Civil Effect--Survey and analysis from the angle of comparative law
ZHANG Chun.The Third Party's Fraud and Defects of Civil Effect--Survey and analysis from the angle of comparative law[J].The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute,2005(5):101-106.
Authors:ZHANG Chun
Abstract:The third party's fraud, which can be taken as defects of civil effect, will result in a void or rescissible civil act. In terms of this kind of fraud, French laws hold that it can't be taken as defects of civil effect; German laws hold that it can only when the adversary is or should be aware of its existence; Italian laws hold that it can whether the adversary is aware of it or not. Actually, Chinese laws have the same opinion as Italian laws in terms of this issue but the inappropriate elements should be overcome in legislature.
Keywords:The Third Party's Fraud  Defects of Civil Effect  Void Civil Act  Rescissible Civil Act  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号