| 证人证言补强证据问题探讨——兼评民事和行政诉讼证据司法解释 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭华. 证人证言补强证据问题探讨——兼评民事和行政诉讼证据司法解释[J]. 天津市政法管理干部学院学报, 2004, 20(4): 3-8 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 郭华（中国政法大学,刑事司法学院,北京,100088） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 理论界对补强证据理论本身、补强证据与案件主要事实和主证据的关系认识存有较大落差,影响了补强证据规则确立的科学性,造成了司法解释规定的偏失.文章从理论的视角对补强证据进行分析和比对,从分析中恢复其应有的含义,从比对中探求建设性意见,并对司法解释的缺陷进行评判,以便正本清源.
|
| 关 键 词： | 补强证据 主证据 主要事实 司法解释 补强规则 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8393(2004)04-0003-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-03-18 |
The Discussion on Corroborative Evidence of the Witness'''' Testimony -- Comment on Judicial Explanation of Civil and Administrative Evidencecs |
| |
| GUO Hua. The Discussion on Corroborative Evidence of the Witness'''' Testimony -- Comment on Judicial Explanation of Civil and Administrative Evidencecs[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law, 2004, 20(4): 3-8 |
| |
| Authors: | GUO Hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Academic circles have different thoughts about the theory of corroborative evidence, and the relations between chief-fact and chief-evidence. Those problems affect the scientific rules of corroborative evidence, making judicial explanation insufficient. From the view of theory, the article analyses the theory of corroborative evidence,resumes to its intrinsical soure based on analysis, presents a suggested opinion according to comparative study,and comments on the insufficiency of judicial explanation, in order to ratify those errors. |
| |
| Keywords: | corroborative evidence chief-evidence chief-fact judicial explanation corroborative rules |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
