首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“共同人性”与“差等人性”的重新反思
引用本文:祁志祥.“共同人性”与“差等人性”的重新反思[J].浙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2010,1(6):5-11.
作者姓名:祁志祥
作者单位:上海财经大学
摘    要:“共同人性”与“差等人性”是人性问题上纠缠不清、争论不休的古老话题。历史上,“共同人性”曾经遭到“性三品”论和“阶级人性”论的冲击和批判,当下又遭到非本质主义哲学的解构,似乎振振有词,理直气壮,其实矛盾百出,遗患甚多。重新盘点、比较、甄别和反思中外思想史上关于“共同人性”与“差等人性”论述的得失,清除差等人性论,肯定共同人性论,不仅在当下具有极大的理论和实践上的拨乱反正意义,而且对于自觉认识和把握普遍人性,顺应人性制定政策方针、实现国泰民安,具有十分重要的启迪意义。

关 键 词:共同人性  性三品  阶级人性  
收稿时间:2010-05-17

A New Reflection on the Common Humanity and the Grade Humanity
QI Zhi-xiang.A New Reflection on the Common Humanity and the Grade Humanity[J].Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University,2010,1(6):5-11.
Authors:QI Zhi-xiang
Institution:QI Zhi-xiang(Department of Journalism and Chinese Language,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
Abstract:The common humanity and the grade humanity are the ancient topics on humanity, which have resulted in a confused, complicated and endless disagreement. Historically, the common humanity was attacked and criticized by doctrine of three classes of human nature and the theory of human nature of class. And presently, they are subjected to deconstruction which are plausibly justified and righteous, but actually are full of paradoxes and contradictions, errors and omissions. It is imperative to re-verify, compare, specify and reflect the gains and losses of expositions on Sino-foreign history of thoughts, which is of theoretical and practical significance for rectification and is of enlightening importance to grasp common humanity, to formulate policies based on humanity and finally to realize peace and prosperity for people and the country respectively.
Keywords:common humanity  doctrine of three classes of human nature  human nature of class
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号