Imperialism in China: An Exchange |
| |
Authors: | John K Fairbank Joseph Esherick Marilyn B Young |
| |
Institution: | 1. Harvard University , USA;2. University of Oregon , USA;3. University of Michigan , USA |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractFrom the viewpoint of those in control of state power, few things can be more frustrating than the relative autonomy of the populace in whose name political power is exercised. However, when a large number, preferably the majority, of those who cherish this autonomy are in need, an unquestionable reason for intervention is provided. When this state of need can be linked, if only in formal terms, to the low productivity of labor, a specific field of intervention is clearly defined. Finally, when relative autonomy, low labor productivity, and need can be shown to coincide in specific groups or social classes, the State and its allies are provided with the social, economic, and political legitimacy to intervene. It is then that their solicitude knows no bounds. Getting people to work more efficiently, more productively, becomes the major goal of society. While this preoccupation has always been present whatever the form of State power, it stands as the raison d’être of all contemporary authoritarian regimes, whether of the left or the right. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|