从思科诉华为案论知识产权之诉讼价值

思科诉华为案展现了知识产权诉讼价值失衡的图景。在知识产权侵权之诉中,正义变得模糊,而利益成为主导,这种价值目标特征表明知识产权正在偏离其制度目标。知识产权的滥用使得新的垄断产生,如何防止权利滥用,以及司法程序在知识产权诉讼中的工具化成为知识产权制度的新课题。

On Procedure Value of Intellectual Property

The Prospect of unbalance of procedure value of intellectual property is exhibited within the case Cisco v. Huawei. Ambiguity of justice and dominant of interest in infringement cases result in the departure of intellectual property from its systematic aim. Monopoly in the name of intellectual property rights causes unfair competition. Intellectual property law should be renovated to avoid the abuse of rights and the trend of judicial procedure being instrumental to the purpose of procedure interest of intellectual property.