| 我国《侵权责任法》中的不作为侵权责任 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张梦瑶. 我国《侵权责任法》中的不作为侵权责任[J]. 天水行政学院学报, 2014, 0(3): 100-103 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张梦瑶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学研究生院民商经济法学院,北京100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为侵权与不作为侵权是以行为为逻辑起点对侵权行为的划分,不作为侵权行为有着自己明显的特点,但是二者在具体的实践中却不易辨认。不作为侵权责任在构成要件上有自己的特点,其规则原则也有特殊性。我国不久之前开始实施的《侵权责任法》中并没有提及“不作为侵权”,更没有分析不作为侵权责任的构成要件。
|
| 关 键 词： | 不作为 侵权责任 构成要件 |
Omission Tort Liability in Tort Liability Law of China |
| |
| ZHANG Meng-yao. Omission Tort Liability in Tort Liability Law of China[J]. , 2014, 0(3): 100-103 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Meng-yao |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Meng-yao (School of Civil and Commercial Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Tort behavior can be divided by omission of tort and action of tort. Omission tort has its own remarkable characteristics. It is not easy to distinguish them in practice. The constituent elements ofomission tort liability have its own characteristics as well as principles of its. Shortly before the start of the Tort Liability Act did not mention＂not as infringement＂,and no analysis is not as constituent elements of the tort liability. |
| |
| Keywords: | omission tort responsibility compositions |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
