Developing the relevance potentialities of national security and foreign policy research: Some proposed criteria |
| |
Authors: | Uzi B. Arad William I. Bacchus Edward Gonzalez Harvey Starr |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Hudson Institute, USA;(2) Commission on the Organization of the Government for the Conduct of Foreign Policy, USA;(3) University of California, Los Angeles and the RAND Corporation, USA;(4) Indiana University, USA |
| |
Abstract: | While effective foreign and national security policy-making increasingly requires research that is produced outside government, little is known about how such research affects the actions of policy-makers, or why it may or may not be policy-relevant to them. This essay poses a number of criteria which can be used to weigh the policy relevance of applied social science research for national security and foreign policy issues. These criteria can be divided into content and process categories, the former including aspects of time, issue salience, format, and confidence; and the latter incorporating questions related to the origin of research, the strategy which informs it, and the tactics by which it is presented. Hopefully, such criteria can be applied to existing works, serve as guidelines for future research, and perhaps illuminate the general role of social knowledge in policy formulation.The authors wish to express their appreciation for the opportunity to participate in the National Security Education Seminar held at Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado, June 18–July13, 1973, directed by Fred A. Sondermann and conducted under the auspices of the National Security Program, New York University, Frank N. Trager, Director. This paper is a revised version of a report originally prepared for the seminar. The views presented here are those of the authors, and not necessarily of any of the institutions with which they are associated. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|